Slaymate Golden Master Messages 7,946 Location Florida Dec 6, 2009 #11 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** 57.7588 GFlops | Slaymate | i7 920 @ 4.21 GHz
Y yzmxer608 Fully Optimized Messages 1,559 Location WI, USA Dec 6, 2009 #12 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Somewhat of an off topic question. Is this program better to use for stability testing than prime95? I'll get my score up as soon as I can .
Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Somewhat of an off topic question. Is this program better to use for stability testing than prime95? I'll get my score up as soon as I can .
Puddle Jumper Mod Emeritus Messages 4,293 Dec 6, 2009 #13 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** yzmxer608 said: Somewhat of an off topic question. Is this program better to use for stability testing than prime95? Click to expand... Yes, you would just need to run more than three passes if you were using it to test stability.
Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** yzmxer608 said: Somewhat of an off topic question. Is this program better to use for stability testing than prime95? Click to expand... Yes, you would just need to run more than three passes if you were using it to test stability.
septic In Runtime Messages 244 Location soul Dec 6, 2009 #14 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** fail
Y yzmxer608 Fully Optimized Messages 1,559 Location WI, USA Dec 6, 2009 #15 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Puddle Jumper said: Yes, you would just need to run more than three passes if you were using it to test stability. Click to expand... Ok, thanks. 14.9189 GFlops | yzmxer608 | X3 8400 @ 2.10 GHz
Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Puddle Jumper said: Yes, you would just need to run more than three passes if you were using it to test stability. Click to expand... Ok, thanks. 14.9189 GFlops | yzmxer608 | X3 8400 @ 2.10 GHz
Hefemeister Lord Techie, Messages 9,093 Location Sweden Dec 6, 2009 #16 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Puddle Jumper said: Nice score Hefe. You might want to try running it with HT disabled, supposedly Linpack performs better without it. Click to expand... Yeah it was just a quick run to get a 4.0 score up. Something the AMD guys could go after. Slaymate said: 57.7588 GFlops | Slaymate | i7 920 @ 4.21 GHz Click to expand... What a shock. Slay with the best time. How did that happen? Darn D0's can run the same clocks with .1 less vcore than C0's
Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Puddle Jumper said: Nice score Hefe. You might want to try running it with HT disabled, supposedly Linpack performs better without it. Click to expand... Yeah it was just a quick run to get a 4.0 score up. Something the AMD guys could go after. Slaymate said: 57.7588 GFlops | Slaymate | i7 920 @ 4.21 GHz Click to expand... What a shock. Slay with the best time. How did that happen? Darn D0's can run the same clocks with .1 less vcore than C0's
B Burn Fully Optimized Messages 1,958 Location San Diego Dec 6, 2009 #17 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Hm.. Look at that.. I win 58.0276 GFlops | Burninator | i7 920 @ 4.21GHz
Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Hm.. Look at that.. I win 58.0276 GFlops | Burninator | i7 920 @ 4.21GHz
Hefemeister Lord Techie, Messages 9,093 Location Sweden Dec 6, 2009 #18 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** I give it 1 day. HT off does make a difference.
B Burn Fully Optimized Messages 1,958 Location San Diego Dec 6, 2009 #19 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** Oh don't worry I have back up scores
Hefemeister Lord Techie, Messages 9,093 Location Sweden Dec 6, 2009 #20 Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** You think that will help especially now that they are known. Backups worked for me for about a week with Slay. I want to see the PIIs. Come on guys.
Re: **The Official TF LINPACK Thread** You think that will help especially now that they are known. Backups worked for me for about a week with Slay. I want to see the PIIs. Come on guys.