Computers |
|
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Monster Techie | Hello as you can see in there picture below my friend states that xp pro is alot better than xp home. I know it support more features that mainly servers would use but he believes there is a performance increase on pro and that home runs less games then xp pro. I have been trying to tell him they are identical besides the added feature here and there but i think everyone here needs to knock some sense into him. I hope I'm right or I'll get a lot of **** handed to me ![]()
__________________ My Budget Rig ~ $600 AUS AMD 5000+ BE @ 3.33GHz TRUE 120 cooler w/tx-2 GA-MA78GM-S2H 780g G.Skill 2GB NQ XFX 8800GS 730/1775/1000 monster oc'er ![]() Antec e.w 380w NSK 4000 case Last edited by baron5; 09-24-2007 at 07:39 AM. |
| |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Newb Techie Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 23
| Home is a locked down version of Pro with some missing features. As far as games or performance go - I would ask him why he thinks this, its like saying a car goes faster because it has a CD player "Pro" rather then a cassette player "Home". Overall it’s the same thing, just has some different functionality and options. Although I do prefer XP Pro I hate having locked down version of anything. |
| |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Monster Techie Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,910
| apart from server and development purposes, i haven't found any difference in performance what so ever. though, you can say, PRO is slower (to some extents) as its running extra tasks that HOME isn't
__________________ AMD Athlon X2 4400+ (Toledo) Asus A8V Deluxe E-VGA 7800GS 256MB AGP 4 X 512MB DDR400 Kingston Value 2 X 160 ATA133 H/D 2 X DVD Drives Antec Sonata II (with 480W PSU) 21.3" Viewsonic VP211b TFT. |
| |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Ultra Techie Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 787
| performance wise it is the same. pro gives you more networking options, and can support multiple cpu's (dual and quad cores are supported, but say a server with that has a dual socket 775 mobo and 2 socket 775 cpu's, you need pro for the 2 cpu's to be recognized) |
| |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Ultra Techie | XP Pro and Home differ only in added programs. speed has nothing to do with it other than the possibility of slowing it down, but not to a noticeable extent. Right now I'm attempting to cut home down to a few k's of memory, but even as much as I've cut, there's not much of a difference in speed, just more space and no added programs working without my knowledge ![]() |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Should I buy a artci freezer 64 pro or more ram? | dario03 | Building, Buying, or Upgrading High Performance PC Systems | 2 | 09-22-2007 06:39 PM |
| x1950 pro | thirdshiftdj | Building, Buying, or Upgrading High Performance PC Systems | 2 | 09-22-2007 01:21 PM |
| Is now a good time to buy a macbook pro? | ulater6000 | Apple, Mac OS , and Power PC | 13 | 09-22-2007 10:24 AM |
| Windows XP PRO vs. 4 GB RAM | saywhat5959 | Windows Operating Systems and Software | 15 | 09-21-2007 06:39 PM |
| PC for Pro tools, pro recording / mixing, maybe Macintosh ? | Eclipse7 | Building, Buying, or Upgrading High Performance PC Systems | 2 | 09-19-2007 10:05 PM |