|  | |
07-08-2005, 01:01 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,434
| Man, Uzi you just aren't understanding what I am saying...I know what I am talking about...
__________________ |
| |
07-08-2005, 01:25 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Super Techie Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 497
| Heyyo,
There's no point really for Intel to hit that 4GHz limit. AMD could easily beat them out with the already impressive FX-57. Heck, the FX-57 isin't even near 4GHz. So AMD could uber-slaughter Intel on single core. They knew this, so inna smart move they focused on dual core. I wasn't so much about fan respect, it was about wroking on getting out the best cpu they can, and their isin't any big improvements left on single core anymore anyways people.
So I say intel did a smart move. Plus, have you guys seen the pricetag on the FX-57? now think of the P4 at 4GHz. yeah. I'd probably be cheaper to get the new mobo that supports dual core and a dual core cpu than get the FX-57 or the P4 GHz (if it existed).
__________________ Later-A-Much, and LONG LIVE THE D! æ ThE_MarÐ |
| |
07-08-2005, 01:29 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Wizard Techie Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Venus, Texas Posts: 4,625
| the p4 wouldnt be able to touch the fx-57 w/ a 10ft pole though so in a sence your right. But it just sounds liek intel is trying to gip AMDs design more and more. saying they are going to the "mobile" design just means hey were trying to be sneaky and try to copy AMD.
__________________ Intel C2D E8400 @ 3.8ghz
XFX 780i SLI
2x2gig G.Skill Black Pi 1013
SLI 9800GTX+ 840/2200/1100
500GB Maxtor 160GB WD
Thermaltake Toughpower 1000watt
Thermaltake V9
Vista Ultimate X64
Razer Lycosa Mirror / Logitech G5 |
| |
07-08-2005, 01:34 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master Techie Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Fort Lewis, WA Posts: 2,520
| Quote: Originally posted by majistic Man, Uzi you just aren't understanding what I am saying...I know what I am talking about... |
What are you trying to say then? |
| |
07-08-2005, 01:39 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Super Techie Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 335
| if i understand him right majistic was basing that on the article that he posted. He didn't realize that it had come out in Oct 2004 so he thought it was new and dual-proc hadn't come out yet...
__________________
My Computer:
-UV Reactive Acrylic Mid-Size Case
-Thermaltake 420W
-AMD Athlon XP \"Barton\" 3200+ 400MHz
-Cooler Master Aero7+
-Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe Mobo
-nVidia GeForce FX 5700 128MB
-2x Kingston HyperX 512MB PC3200
-2x 200GB WD 7200 8MB SATA
-2x 12\" UV Cold Cathodes
-5x 80MM 4UV LED Blue UV-Reactive Fans
My Laptop:
P3 750MHz, 512MB, CD-RW/DVD Combo, 15.1\" TFT, 20GB HD, 32MB integrated video |
| |
07-08-2005, 02:48 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,434
| No no, I knew dual-procs had came out. I never followed Pentiums. (i've always been an AMD fanboy) So I didn't know that Pentium had a dual proc out..but still I agree with Mguire and MarD say, Intel is going to need to come up with some uber quick and great to get near the FX-57.
__________________ |
| |
07-08-2005, 03:14 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Master Techie Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Fort Lewis, WA Posts: 2,520
| Intel is trashing the NetBurst architecture, because Pentium M's OC'd can beat a FX-55. They are mobile processors and they are designed to run as cool as possible. But if you use the Pentium M in accordance with a full size desktop HSF, you should be able to get a great Overclock.
Intel is getting their act together. So 2-3 years down the road the tables might turn. |
| |
07-08-2005, 03:20 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Lord Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 8,025
| My new sig pertains to intel basicly re-releasing the pentium 3 |
| |
07-08-2005, 03:23 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Milford, Connecticut Posts: 4,137
| Quote: Originally posted by DJ-CHRIS My new sig pertains to intel basicly re-releasing the pentium 3 | DJ-CHRIS Spell Check: December
And the reason they have cancelled the 4.0Ghz development is because they've found that if you put a frying pan on-top of the CPU, you can cook a steak better then a George Forman...
It's just too **** power hungry...
__________________ New signature coming soon. |
| |
07-08-2005, 03:26 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Lord Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 8,025
| Thanks for helping not make an !d!0t of myself
Spelt knowledge wrong in a title, and the title was knowledge = power |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |