Computers |
|
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Commander Super Mod Joker Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: In Trotter's crawl space
Posts: 15,643
| Ink would still be expensive. Kodak is the only cheap ink. Well i fyou print photos then yes. It does matter. Kodak is a picture company and the ink they use is good. Not the best but good. Lexmark ink runs about $18 for Black and $22 or so for color. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Idealist Gamer Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 291
| Quote:
I was thinking of getting this one: Amazon.com: Kodak ESP3 SE All-in-One Printer - 8406324: Electronics Its more than I wanted to spend but it seems more than worth the price even without the savings on ink. Which are from what I've heard about $10-20 per black and color refill, depending on what you compare it to. See its 16.6 wide but the space is quite literally 16.5 wide. Its a shelf built into my computer desk and I really have no where else I could put it. I have my current printer sideways but I really wanted to have it straight. Last edited by Dakaggo; 05-13-2008 at 12:05 AM. Reason: typo | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Moderator Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,524
| Ah.. .. I should investigate that option more seriously next time I want a inkjet. I refuse to pay more than $5-10 bucks for a ink cartridge/refill.. Of course, it does depend on how many pages it prints... But, on average I mean. Right now, I am giving the color laser thing a go. Lets see how that works out. ![]() Quote:
__________________ C++ compiler, Wikipedia - online encyclopedia, Free online textbooks, Yahoo! Desktop, Avast! anti-virus, Best freeware tech forums links: Important websites, Freeware list Last edited by Chankama; 05-13-2008 at 08:05 AM. | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Commander Super Mod Joker Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: In Trotter's crawl space
Posts: 15,643
| Yes i have been looking and searching for a deal on the Kodaks for a while. They are good r[printers for the price. Dakagoo, i read about your limits and i am sorry that Kodak doesnt have one small enough for you. That one you linked to is great. The trade off is this. You spend more on the printer save it on the ink. With many other printers you will get the opposite. Save on the printer pay for the ink. ![]() I am sure that you could squeeze in that printer to your spot. A suggestion. Turn it sideways when not in use?? |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Idealist Gamer Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 291
| Quote:
You save on the Ink but is the cartridge the same volume? | |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Commander Super Mod Joker Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: In Trotter's crawl space
Posts: 15,643
| Yes. I have personally seen the size of Kodak ink cartridges and compared it with my Lexmark and Epson. They are a tad bit smaller but they all hold close to the same amount of ink. Kodak was middle of them from my views with my printers. Lexmark had more Epson had less than Kodak. So from my reviews the Kodak is fully worth every cent. I hope that helps. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lexmark USB printer issue | superdave1984 | Hardware Troubleshooting | 2 | 04-28-2008 02:17 PM |
| Windows cannot connect to the printer operation could not be complete | zillah | Computer Networking & Internet Access | 1 | 04-21-2008 10:36 AM |
| Printer Sharing | RadRacer | Windows Operating Systems and Software | 5 | 01-17-2008 12:45 AM |
| Password Protect Printer | Gizzard1200 | Windows Operating Systems and Software | 0 | 01-02-2008 03:36 PM |
| Printer and printer cable | Instrumediatech | Hardware Troubleshooting | 5 | 06-12-2007 07:27 AM |