Computers |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Ultra Techie Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 818
| Well, DVI (digital) and VGA (analog) definitely have a quality gap between them. Im pretty sure that digital just gives you better response time by the graphics card, as well as it is on high quality machines to deliver more pixels at a similar or faster rate than VGA. I am suprised that you do not see a quality discepancy or response time discrepancy between DVI and VGA on your dell 19 inch LCD. Also, just as a a note, Stereo sounds better to me than mono sound ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Super Techie Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 268
| Hi After reading a few reports about DVI vs analog it seems modern set ups have little to gain (if anything) from DVI these days. Although you would presume DVI to be superior (due to its all digital interface, not digital>analog>digital) it no longer holds true on some systems, I think it all boils down to the hardware in question and of course the human eye. DVI (in theory) should give better colour definitation and a more 'vibrant' sharper picture. If you have the DVI option use it anyway, as it will not be worse than analog but at least equal and maybe slightly better (hopefully). |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |