|  | | 
09-28-2008, 07:37 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Dakota Posts: 6,291
|  Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor.  Vista is the future ,LOL, maybe windows 7. A friend of mine has vista and its a piece of junk, there are so many driver incompatibility's. All i have to say is windows xp 64bit, or windows server 2003, is the way to go for now, wait tell windows 7 comes out, maybe then i'll upgrade.
sorry for my rant, its coming from experience, vista is just not worth it.
i recently upgraded to windows xp pro 64bit due to the limitations of the x86 version. It gave me nothing but trouble, ever since i upgraded to the sli 4gb duel channel memory, that is. | Apparently your friend using old hardware, cuz I have Vista on my laptop, and several members here use Vista as their main OS and it works fine. Vista 64bit is much more compatible with things than XP 64bit is, BTW.
__________________ If I help you, or you just like what I said, rep me by clicking the scale under my avatar | 
|  | |
09-28-2008, 08:06 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: C:\Windows\System32 Posts: 27,249
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor. Vista is the future ,LOL, maybe windows 7. A friend of mine has vista and its a piece of junk, there are so many driver incompatibility's. All i have to say is windows xp 64bit, or windows server 2003, is the way to go for now, wait tell windows 7 comes out, maybe then i'll upgrade.
sorry for my rant, its coming from experience, vista is just not worth it.
i recently upgraded to windows xp pro 64bit due to the limitations of the x86 version. It gave me nothing but trouble, ever since i upgraded to the sli 4gb duel channel memory, that is. | :laughing::laughing::laughing:
Yeah whatever. Read thru any topic in the Windows area. I have answered just about every Vista question that has come around from stuff that "doesnt work" to stuff that is "incompatible"...
All bogus. Unless your friend is trying to run it on a machine that cant even run Windows 95 correctly there is no reason for Vista not to work.
STOP blaming the software when it is USER errors causing the issues. Install Vista. Dont install anything else. I will bet you that it will run for months without issues. But the minute you start to mess with it things go wrong. You install a wrong driver, you install software that isnt compatible with Vista, you try to force Vista to use a 5 year old app cause you like it instead of finding a suitable replace that will work.
All of which are not Vista's fault. If the drivers dont work blame the people who WRITE the drivers. Microsoft doesnt.
Yet another person who doesnt know where to place the blame. Things Microsoft writes all the software and drivers that make the machines work.
__________________ R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter
14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009 Images created by CarnageX | Decaptured...Listen! | Visit Baezware!! | You've been Mak'd! | 儿做好 | windbg tutorial I do not accept support questions via EMail, PM, IM or my Spaces page! .:|:. This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.
Thanks to all the guys on the staff for your support in my time of need. Hefe you are my personal Hero for your contribution. <<<< If I help you, or you just like what I said, rep me   | |
| | |
09-28-2008, 08:10 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 6,762
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor. Vista is the future ,LOL, maybe windows 7. A friend of mine has vista and its a piece of junk, there are so many driver incompatibility's. All i have to say is windows xp 64bit, or windows server 2003, is the way to go for now, wait tell windows 7 comes out, maybe then i'll upgrade.
sorry for my rant, its coming from experience, vista is just not worth it.
i recently upgraded to windows xp pro 64bit due to the limitations of the x86 version. It gave me nothing but trouble, ever since i upgraded to the sli 4gb duel channel memory, that is. | Oh not this crap again...
Look Vista is a HUGE improvement over XP, not just in style but in security. It might not play nice with older / cheeper hardware but it will work on newer system. It also depends on the specs of the comp it's running on.
An this is coming from a *nix fanboy, all this was said about XP when it first came out.
__________________ If you use SQL and are interested and care about database security you really need to check this out, http://www.greensql.net/
It's one of those rare "perfect" kernels. So if it doesn't happen to compile with your config (or it does compile, but then does unspeakable acts of perversion with your pet dachshund), you can rest easy knowing that it's all your own **** fault, and you should just fix your evil ways. - Linus Torvalds in a 2005 message to the Linux kernel mailing list.
Look if you can't find time for a little Humour in your day, you are not really living, and if your not enjoying life what is the point?
| |
| | |
09-28-2008, 09:53 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
Newb Techie Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 10
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
i guess its a personal opinion when it comes down to a OS, if i had a choice it would of been Linux. Windows xp 64bit runs pretty much all my hardware with out any problems at all, and i have some pretty outdated hardware that i have tested, it works 100%.
ps try running alcohol 120%, its a garenteed crash under vista.
let the wars begin
Last edited by Thor.; 09-28-2008 at 09:58 PM.
| |
| | |
09-28-2008, 10:58 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: C:\Windows\System32 Posts: 27,249
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
Ummm. No. Try using the latest version. Here is a whole guide on how to burn a ISO with Alcohol 120 that i took screen shots with in VISTA. :eek:
No crash. Burning ISO Images with Alcohol 120 - NeoSmart Technologies Wiki
Sorry but your guarantee just payed me something cause i just proved it wrong. I run it just fine. I have burned at least 200 DVD's with Alcohol 120% in Vista. Sorry but you just shown that running outdated hardware that doesnt have the correct drivers wont work. In which case you are right. Blame the manufacturer's for this. They write the drivers. Not Microsoft.
Just to be even more clear. You need a version from 1.9.5 or newer. They are on 1.9.7 right now. So again as i stated above use the most current versions of the software and not outdated software.
__________________ R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter
14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009 Images created by CarnageX | Decaptured...Listen! | Visit Baezware!! | You've been Mak'd! | 儿做好 | windbg tutorial I do not accept support questions via EMail, PM, IM or my Spaces page! .:|:. This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.
Thanks to all the guys on the staff for your support in my time of need. Hefe you are my personal Hero for your contribution. <<<< If I help you, or you just like what I said, rep me
Last edited by Mak213; 09-28-2008 at 11:00 PM.
| |
| | |
09-29-2008, 02:43 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
Formerly charles_scott Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 4,671
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
Honestly, at first I had nothing but issues with Vista 32bit, but once I started to find updated drivers from manufactures, and newer software such as Alcohol 120% ver. 1.9.7, I found that I had no more issues. I finaly switched to 64bit the other night though, and started to have issues with Vista addressing more than 4gb of ram... Found out that the 64bit edition needed a small patch to use more than 4gb, got that patch, and haven't had any issues since. Just wish my dial up on vista 64bit would work right... Keeps getting dropped.
| |
| | |
10-01-2008, 05:41 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
PowerQuest / Opera Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Netherlands Posts: 10,100
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
Almost any 32bit CPU since the Pentium Pro (more than 10 years ago) can address 64GiB of physical memory (36bit addressing space). It only depends on the OS.
Physical Address Extension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| |
| | |
10-01-2008, 07:59 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: C:\Windows\System32 Posts: 27,249
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
Yes which is mentioned adn discussed in the first link of my first post of the thread.
That thread talks of hte addressing issues of 32 Bit OS's and how it cant work with more than 4GB cause of the limited number os addresses it has.
__________________ R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter
14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009 Images created by CarnageX | Decaptured...Listen! | Visit Baezware!! | You've been Mak'd! | 儿做好 | windbg tutorial I do not accept support questions via EMail, PM, IM or my Spaces page! .:|:. This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.
Thanks to all the guys on the staff for your support in my time of need. Hefe you are my personal Hero for your contribution. <<<< If I help you, or you just like what I said, rep me | |
| | |
02-08-2009, 01:31 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
It's all just 1s and 0s Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: in the lab Posts: 4,767
| Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation.
double post again. twice today. | |
| | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
| |
Re: 32 bit OS RAM limitation. 
