Which would be faster? - Computer Forums

Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password

Slogan

Computer Forums » Which would be faster?

Closed Thread

Old

08-15-2006, 05:05 PM

#1 (permalink)

Jumping_Bean514

Ultra Techie

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: Seattle

Posts: 749

Jumping_Bean514 is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Jumping_Bean514

Default

Which would be faster?

a 74GB raptor by itself, or two 36GB raptors in raid 0? Do you think the proformance would justify the cost of two? do you think there would be a noticable increase in proformance at all?

Jumping_Bean514 is offline

Old

08-15-2006, 05:08 PM

#2 (permalink)

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: Virginia Beach

Posts: 3,591

Nukem will become famous soon enough

Default

neither... get 2, 250GB Sata II's and RAID em. you'll have both performance AND space... Raptors are nice, but over rated now-a-days

__________________

http://www.tech-forums.net/pc/showgroups.php

If I help you, or you just like what I said, rep me by clicking the scale under my avatar.

Nukem is offline

Old

08-15-2006, 05:50 PM

#3 (permalink)

Lord Techie

Join Date: Jan 2006

Location: Oxford, UK

Posts: 6,354

gurusan will become famous soon enough

Default

definitely over rated

__________________
|| E8400 @ 4200MHz || Foxconn Blackops || 4GB DDR3 1866MHz CL8 ||
|| Sapphire 4890 Vapor-X 940/4520 || Toughpower 750W || Antec P182 ||
|| 2048x1152 23" Samsung || Scythe Mine || Sennheiser HD580 ||

gurusan is offline

Closed Thread

« Multiple hard drives??? | Building for a budge, help wanted. »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Contact Us - Computer Technology Forums - Archive - Top