Computers |
|
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Wizard Techie Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
| Quote:
Is Intel's 'Penryn' Chip Hiding Graphics Support?
__________________ ![]() CPU: Core 2 Quad Q6600 MOBO: Intel DP35DP Video card: eVGA 8800GTS 320MB Hard drive: WD 500GB Monitor: Samsung 206BW 20" Wide OS: Windows XP Professional SP2 | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Self Proclaimed Immortal | Hm...would be kinda interesting considering the power of todays GPUs and if they were not bottlenecked by cache. If this is utilized in the production versions of the chips...we will have even faster clocks and our programs will run that much faster.....seems like its very good technology. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Multicellular Eukaryote Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 12,885
| Quote:
But then again, AMD's HTT goes well with anything | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Admin Das BanHammer Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The South
Posts: 14,779
| Intel chips do not have on-die memory controllers, so they are limited by the speed of the FSB. Everything must pass through the chipset both ways. This is where AMD really made their speed difference known. Intel keeps raising the FSB, but it is still there. If Intel has added an on-die mem controller I have not heard about it. |
| | |