Computers |
|
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Super Techie Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 243
| I've been talking to a buddy who is knowledgeable on computers, and he tells me that FX 74 will be a much more responsive system than the Q6600. What do you think? Last edited by Sirius_GTO; 09-18-2007 at 06:22 PM. |
| |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Wizard Techie Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,403
| Don't waste your money on FX-74 Just get Q6600 because it is much cheaper And it seems that Q6600 beats it most of time AnandTech: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 and Massive Price Cuts Not to mention that Q6600 consume less power, and overclocks much better than two FX-74
__________________ ![]() CPU: Core 2 Quad Q6600 MOBO: Intel DP35DP Video card: eVGA 8800GTS 320MB Hard drive: WD 500GB Monitor: Samsung 206BW 20" Wide OS: Windows XP Professional SP2 Last edited by maroon1; 09-18-2007 at 07:46 AM. |
| |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| MetalHead Techie Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,891
| fx-74, is about even in the 3d rendering with the q6600, but the q6600 can overclock much better
__________________ Proc e2180 m0 @ stock Video 8800gt 512mb Display 22'' Monitor Chemei 5ms RT, 800:1 CR Mobo Abit ip35-e Mem Crucial Ballistix 2 x 1 gb DDR2 800 @ 960 Case NZXT Zero ATX Aluminum Full Tower + 8 silent fans- 7 x 120mm 1 x 80mm Sound Logitech z-5300e 5.1 + Icemat siberia full black headset + Creative Soundblaster Audigy SE PSU Corsair 520hx OS Vista 64-Bit Home Premium Cooling Stock fan, mx-2 (left backplate from tuniq when RMA'd board) HDD Seagate 500gb 32mb Cache -92% of teens have moved on to rap. If you are part of the 8% who still listen to real music, copy this. |
| |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Wizard Techie Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,403
| Quote:
There is no reason to get pair of FX-74 because Q6600 is much cheaper and overclocks much better
__________________ ![]() CPU: Core 2 Quad Q6600 MOBO: Intel DP35DP Video card: eVGA 8800GTS 320MB Hard drive: WD 500GB Monitor: Samsung 206BW 20" Wide OS: Windows XP Professional SP2 | |
| |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Wizard Techie Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,403
| First: FX-74 doesn't use FSB, it uses Hypertransport instead Second: Q6600 have 8MB L2 cache, much more than FX-74 Third: Having higher GHz doesn't mean that the processor is better. The older Pentium 4 processors had much higher GHz than Athlon64 but they performed worse. The new Intel core 2 processors can do more instruction per Hz than AMD processors. Just look at the review I posted above, Core 2 Duo 2.33GHz (E6550) outperformed AMD 2.8GHz (5600+). Quote:
Click here to see the article FX-74 consume too much power And since they consume too much power, I think they are not good for overclocking
__________________ ![]() CPU: Core 2 Quad Q6600 MOBO: Intel DP35DP Video card: eVGA 8800GTS 320MB Hard drive: WD 500GB Monitor: Samsung 206BW 20" Wide OS: Windows XP Professional SP2 Last edited by maroon1; 09-18-2007 at 02:50 PM. | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q6600 first boot up. Idles at 50 C after a few minutes? | TheOtis | Hardware Troubleshooting | 18 | 08-09-2007 12:20 PM |
| Power Requirements for Q6600? | will h4x 4 food | Building, Buying, or Upgrading High Performance PC Systems | 31 | 06-27-2007 10:33 PM |
| q6600 for gaming and OC | Riznarf | Building, Buying, or Upgrading High Performance PC Systems | 37 | 06-19-2007 10:12 PM |
| Overclocking a q6600 | Riznarf | Building, Buying, or Upgrading High Performance PC Systems | 2 | 06-04-2007 02:42 AM |
| Cheapest Q6600 Build | Gumbercules | Building, Buying, or Upgrading High Performance PC Systems | 34 | 06-01-2007 01:01 AM |