Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Closed Thread
Old 05-11-2007, 08:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
True Techie

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 224

darsunt is on a distinguished road

Default Difference between Presler and Core 2 Duo

I'm looking at two CPUs, a Pentium D 925 Presler and an Intel Core 2 Duo E43000. The Presler has just gone down in price, while the Core 2 is about $25 more.

The Presler is rated 3.0 G while the Core 2 is 1.8G. They seem very similar so why is the Core 2 more expensive?
darsunt is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Ultra Techie

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 609

spartan1121 is on a distinguished road

Default Re: Difference between Presler and Core 2 Duo

The core2 architecture is just better, it isn't all about the ghz. someone on here can explain it better than i can, but i think theres a tutorial on it, so check up top in the tutorial section. The thread is like somethin about what ghz really matters, intel ghz vs AMD ghz.
here's the link The Truth About Processor Performance (a.k.a AMD GHz vs. Intel GHz)
__________________
spartan1121 is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
Nitestick's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005

Location: Locked in a dungeon, Perth

Posts: 8,034

Nitestick will become famous soon enoughNitestick will become famous soon enough

Default Re: Difference between Presler and Core 2 Duo

because it processes far more efficiently than the Pentium D and does so at lower power consumption and heat output. the Core 2 Duo's are pretty much all more powerful than the Pentium D series, despite their lower frequencies.
__________________
Get FireFox
Saxon's Blog|Saxon's Forum - CHECK IT OUT!
Fold for tech forums. MY COMPUTER HELPS CURE CANCER!
"Sniffing Powdered Ubuntu CDs Cures Cancer!" - TuxMachines.org

/Q6600@3.0GHz/4GB Kingston DDR2-800/Gigabyte P35-DS3R/Asus HD4850 512MB|Antec TPII 480w1.50TB of Caviar goodnessWinFast DTV-1000TTT Soprano
If I or anyone else have given you good/bad advice, use the scales icon below their name to adjust their reputation accordingly
I'm sorry but I do not accept support requests via IM, email, or personal messages
You can contact me for Forum related issues via PM only.

Quote:
Originally Posted by veedubfreak View Post
MTv happened. That and parents cant beat their children for being drooling leeches on society anymore.
Nitestick is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Jul 2006

Location: New Stanton, Pennsylvania

Posts: 1,017

psp_crazy1 is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to psp_crazy1
Default Re: Difference between Presler and Core 2 Duo

yea, PD is pretty much 2 P4s, which aren't nearly good as a Core 2 duo. I bet a core 2 duo e4300 could outperform the PD EE edtition (it can outperform the x6800, so why not?)
__________________
AMD 4850 - e4300 / Tuniq
Gigabyte DS3 - Gskill NQ 2gb
WD 200gb - Hitachi 60gb
Ultra ATX wizard case - Xcilio 500 watt


Toshiba Satellite A305
Sony Vaio VGN-BX560B
Sony Vaio (P3, 256mb RAM)
psp_crazy1 is offline  
Old 05-12-2007, 12:57 AM   #5 (permalink)
Sora's Avatar
 
Renowned Budgeting Master

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location: Uniontown, PA

Posts: 4,158

Sora is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Sora
Default Re: Difference between Presler and Core 2 Duo

You cannot compare clock speed as each architecture is different with the Core 2 Duo's being much better. The E4300 will destroy a Pentium D...especially after being overclocked to around 3.0ghz.

Pentium D's have trouble keeping up with Athlon X2's which have trouble keeping up with the Core 2 Duos....
__________________
E6300 w/ Arctic Freezer Pro 7 @ 3.6ghz 1.4Vcore
Antec 900 Case
EVGA 750i FTW Mobo
4x1GB of G.skill DDR2-800
2 8800GT in SLI
22" Samsung Syncmaster
1 250GB WD and 1 Seagate 7200.10 in RAID 0
Corsair 520HX 3DMark06 Score: 13900
Sora is offline  
Old 05-12-2007, 12:43 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
True Techie

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 224

darsunt is on a distinguished road

Default Re: Difference between Presler and Core 2 Duo

Got the Core 2 Duo, it was only $25 more. Just wanted to be sure more expensive was better in this case.
darsunt is offline  
Old 05-12-2007, 03:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
vernong1992's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006

Posts: 19,821

vernong1992 is a jewel in the roughvernong1992 is a jewel in the roughvernong1992 is a jewel in the roughvernong1992 is a jewel in the rough

Default Re: Difference between Presler and Core 2 Duo

Pros and Cons of Pentium D
Pros:
- higher clock speed
- more cache if ur looking at the e6300, e6400 and e4300 and e4400 (these two factors don't make much of an edge over c2d)
- 65 nm (but this is also in core 2 duo)

Cons:
- runs hot
- if u get a SmithField processor (not 900 series) u get 90 nm
- not as overclockable as Core2 Duo
- Netburst Architecture not favored in games
- Not as efficient as Core 2 Duo
- Power Consuming....
- The EE version is pricier than the Core 2 Duo and is wayyyyyyyy slower
- Not worth it when the higher-end 900 series are more expensive than most Core 2 Duos and not as powerful
- Can't even fight x2 processors let alone the Core 2 Duo....
vernong1992 is online now  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On