|  | |
07-19-2007, 08:13 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Win7 + Zune HD = ♥ Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Riverside, CA Posts: 2,730
| AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year AMD turns in $600 million loss
im not saying im surprised, im just saying that it was obvious n i hope AMD can do better in Q3-Q4.
im still supporting it until AMD dies for all i care, im not moving to intel ever!
__________________ --Windows 7 64-bit Home Premium - OEM (10/22/09)
--AMD Phenom II 940 w/ MX-2 and Tuniq @ 3.589GHz
--OCZ Reaper HPC Edition 4GB DDR2 800 @ 872 4-4-4-12-24 2.2v
--SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 3870 X2 PCI-E x16 w/ MX-2
--MSI K9A2 Platinum 790FX SB600 AM2+
--Seagate 3.5" 1TB SATA II 3.0Gb/s 7200.12 7200 RPM 32MB Cache
--COOLER MASTER HAF 932
--Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer 7.1 Channels 24-bit 96KHz
--Xclio Greatpower series 700w X14 Silent 120mm Fan Series Steam - xWildsidex, Crysis/Crysis Wars - Wildside, Games for Windows - LIVE - xWildsidex, Diablo 2/LoD - Wildside-1, Quake Live - Wildside, Wii Friends Code - 4206-7308-6394-7531 |
| |
07-19-2007, 08:17 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Junior Techie Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 58
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year thanks for your opinion...which i find to just be wrong, but it is your own statement which i can't neglect. AMD is not going to make a Yankee like comeback anywhere in the next 1 month or so... so i would probably recommend getting an Intel right now and overclocking it. I mean, you could probably get an AMD as it just fell in price, but it wouldn't be a smart thing to do unless you have a low budget or can't overclock. |
| |
07-19-2007, 08:19 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Formerly Beefcake Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Ohio, United States Posts: 1,945
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year When it comes to hardware, all I care about is performance, so I will go with what ever has great performance for the price, wither it be AMD or Intel. Although I don't want AMD to go away since that would stop the price wars unless another company can take on Intel like AMD has been. |
| |
07-19-2007, 09:17 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 19,821
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year Quote:
Originally Posted by Beefcake When it comes to hardware, all I care about is performance, so I will go with what ever has great performance for the price, wither it be AMD or Intel. Although I don't want AMD to go away since that would stop the price wars unless another company can take on Intel like AMD has been. | ^i 2nd dat' |
| |
07-19-2007, 09:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
gone Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,030
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildside AMD turns in $600 million loss
im not saying im surprised, im just saying that it was obvious n i hope AMD can do better in Q3-Q4.
im still supporting it until AMD dies for all i care, im not moving to intel ever! | well besides the fact that you sound like a dumb AMD fanboy, I think AMD deserved to lose even more for refusing to lower their prices even further after the core 2 duos spanked them hard. Only a complete idiot would get an AMD processor for anything but an incredably low end system. |
| |
07-19-2007, 09:32 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
3D and CAD professional Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 1,084
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year Its in all our intrests for AMD to stay up there. Nobody likes a monopoly...
__________________ |
| |
07-19-2007, 10:05 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Junior Techie Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 93
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year Although I prefer Intel, I would have to agree that we need AMD for competition if we want affordable "ownage in a can" Intel processors. Not to mention that if Intel has no one to compete with it will slow down how fast they develop new technology...and that just won't do.
__________________ Intel Pentium D @ 3.4ghz
Kingston 512 x 4 DDR2 RAM
Nvidia 7900 GT KO
200gb SATA |
| |
07-19-2007, 10:13 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Kenyon, Minnesota Posts: 405
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year I want IBM to get back into consumer processors instead of only server systems.... oh the 3-way war would be a wondrous thing... *only has a few dollars in wallet, but still can afford quad core* |
| |
07-19-2007, 10:14 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 19,821
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year Quote:
Originally Posted by sadisticmidget Although I prefer Intel, I would have to agree that we need AMD for competition if we want affordable "ownage in a can" Intel processors. Not to mention that if Intel has no one to compete with it will slow down how fast they develop new technology...and that just won't do. | yes... we don't want a Rockefeller incident again..... |
| |
07-19-2007, 10:16 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Wizard Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Delaware Posts: 3,459
| Re: AMD turns in $600 million loss for Q2 financial year Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabb well besides the fact that you sound like a dumb AMD fanboy, I think AMD deserved to lose even more for refusing to lower their prices even further after the core 2 duos spanked them hard. Only a complete idiot would get an AMD processor for anything but an incredably low end system. | Why would they try to loose even more money? Intel can make chips a lot cheaper than AMD can.
Don't forget that AMD began K9 right after K8 and scrapped it (a completely new design - you wonder why they bought ATI?). Barcelona is just an evolution of the K8 from K7.
__________________ Intel Prescott 3.0 Socket 478
Seagate 250GB 16MB Cache
160GB Seagate in Vantec NexStar 3 Enclosure
ASUS P4P800-E Deluxe
LG DVD-ROM
NEC DVD-RW DL
1GB Corsair PC3200
GeForce 5700 256MB DDR |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |