Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Closed Thread
Old 01-04-2007, 01:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Ultra Techie

Join Date: Sep 2005

Location: LONDON

Posts: 785

robina_80 is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to robina_80
Default plasma or LCD

i want a new monitor for my computer plus im going to be using it as a tv aswell but its mainly going to be used with computer and when i get a nintendo wii im going to plug that up to it aswell my question is what should i get plasma or LCD pep say plasmas better for tv but lcd is beter for computer/console
__________________
Windows 7 Home Pre
AMD X2 4200+
ASUS HD 4850 1 GB
80gb - 320gb
4Gb PC3200
Gbyte K8N PRO SLi
icute 750W modular psu
Creative SB Aud SE 7.1
robina_80 is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Nukem's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: Virginia Beach

Posts: 3,595

Nukem will become famous soon enough

Default

LCD... from what I have read/talked to people about/heard the HD format and digital channals like LCD better than plasma for picture quality.
__________________
http://www.tech-forums.net/pc/showgroups.php

If I help you, or you just like what I said, rep me by clicking the scale under my avatar.
Nukem is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
SHAWN's Avatar
 
Field Engineer

Join Date: Nov 2004

Location: Long Island, NY

Posts: 4,687

SHAWN is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to SHAWN
Default

LCD > Plasma - in reliability
Plasma > LCD - picture quality

This is my opinion.
__________________
A+, Network + and MCP
Specs: AMD Athlon X2 3800+ @ 2.6GHz, DFi NF4 Ultra-d, 2GB DDR400, 2x80GB WD Sata in Raid 0, 7600gt, WXPP SP3
Downloads: View CPU, RAM, Cache and Speed specs w/CPU-ID ~ Memory Tester ~ Fraps ~
Free Spyware Scan ~ Spy Sweeper - Trial ~ Free Virus Scan ~ Diskeeper (Defrag Tool) ~
Firefox Browser ~ How to do a Repair Install for Windows 2000/XP ~ CPU's: Intel vs AMD ~

SHAWN is offline  
Old 01-04-2007, 01:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Banned

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 7,928

talldude123

Send a message via Yahoo to talldude123
Default

Plasma's bulb will blow after 30,000 hours of use or so.

Think how much we leave our monitor on and watch TV. It adds up.
talldude123 is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 04:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Newb Techie

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 8

unknown SOLDIER

Default

Seriously go with the LCD there are to many horror stories with the plasma i mean why else are they cheaper.
Plus with the plasma all you will end doing is burn the picture into the screen from your desktop background etc, as they tend to burn still images after a period of time.
unknown SOLDIER is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 09:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
True Techie

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 133

apdrummer

Default

I say LCD as well. Plasmas are too expensive and according to popular science there will be laser televisions coming out offering even higher resolutions and visible colors.
__________________
http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/5540/tf20kbo2.jpg
eVGA nForce 680i
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.92GHz
eVGA 8800GTS
2 x 1GB Kingston DDR2 800 HyperX
2 x WD Caviar 250GB in RAID 0
Antec TP3 650W
Arctic Cooler 7 Pro
apdrummer is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 01:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
GreenMachine's Avatar
 
Super Techie

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 267

GreenMachine is on a distinguished road

Default

**** no plasma sux. I've spoken with people high up in retail and management of sales for companies producing plasma.. they sell because people want to buy them. The plasma has a strong tendancy to attract dust which destroys the picture.

And yeah he's right, plasma TV's last for on average just over a third of what LCD's last for.. ouch. Also, my uncle a year ago bragged to me about his 42" or 47" plasma tv. 7 months later the entire thing was scrap. and his story is the common story.

So many Plasma TV owners fight the 'burn-in' syndrome. Colors displayed on teh tv for extended periods of time. For instance, watching a movie in widescreen... those two black bars on top and bottom stay black for hours.. and that's only for one movie.

Interestingly, the technology of the future will be far better than anything we have right now. The screen will actually be a thin film between 2 very tiny anti-reflective panes of glass using LED lite technology. The word Organic has come up numerous times.. There will be no tubes like in moniters today. The 'organic LED' will consume FAR less power by having the ability to limit light.. as opposed to having your entire screen lit 100%.


I don't know too much about it yet as it's new technology, but it's exciting. Supposedly after they come down in price they'll be less expensive than moniters today.
__________________
EVGA X58 3XSLI, Core i7 920, Vista Home Premium x64, 6GB OCZ DDR3, GTX 285 SSC Edition

for sale>>AMD X2 4600+, 2GB Corsair DDR2 6400, Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H, 300GB/500GB SATA II 7200rpm, 2 - GeForce 8600GT using Physix, Windows XP MCE, Thermaltake 700 Watt PS, Sony DVD +- R Dual Layer, Creative 5.1 Sound, 19" NEC MultiSync 90GX2
GreenMachine is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 09:07 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 3,480

maroon1 is on a distinguished road

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SHAWN

Plasma > LCD - picture quality
Not true.

LCD usually have more pixels per inch

The only advantage of Plasma over LCD that it has better contrast ratio.
maroon1 is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 09:33 AM   #9 (permalink)
Nitestick's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005

Location: Locked in a dungeon, Perth

Posts: 8,036

Nitestick will become famous soon enoughNitestick will become famous soon enough

Default

in almost every conceivable aspect LCD screens are better than Plasma screens.

Quote:
Interestingly, the technology of the future will be far better than anything we have right now. The screen will actually be a thin film between 2 very tiny anti-reflective panes of glass using LED lite technology. The word Organic has come up numerous times.. There will be no tubes like in moniters today. The 'organic LED' will consume FAR less power by having the ability to limit light.. as opposed to having your entire screen lit 100%.
actually i'm not a big fan of OLED screens, besides it seems we're heading towards laser screens (thank you Australia )
__________________
Get FireFox
Saxon's Blog|Saxon's Forum - CHECK IT OUT!
Fold for tech forums. MY COMPUTER HELPS CURE CANCER!
"Sniffing Powdered Ubuntu CDs Cures Cancer!" - TuxMachines.org

/Q6600@3.0GHz/4GB Kingston DDR2-800/Gigabyte P35-DS3R/Asus HD4850 512MB|Antec TPII 480w1.50TB of Caviar goodnessWinFast DTV-1000TTT Soprano
If I or anyone else have given you good/bad advice, use the scales icon below their name to adjust their reputation accordingly
I'm sorry but I do not accept support requests via IM, email, or personal messages
You can contact me for Forum related issues via PM only.

Quote:
Originally Posted by veedubfreak View Post
MTv happened. That and parents cant beat their children for being drooling leeches on society anymore.
Nitestick is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 11:42 AM   #10 (permalink)
GreenMachine's Avatar
 
Super Techie

Join Date: Jan 2007

Posts: 267

GreenMachine is on a distinguished road

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nitestick
in almost every conceivable aspect LCD screens are better than Plasma screens.


What HE said !
__________________
EVGA X58 3XSLI, Core i7 920, Vista Home Premium x64, 6GB OCZ DDR3, GTX 285 SSC Edition

for sale>>AMD X2 4600+, 2GB Corsair DDR2 6400, Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H, 300GB/500GB SATA II 7200rpm, 2 - GeForce 8600GT using Physix, Windows XP MCE, Thermaltake 700 Watt PS, Sony DVD +- R Dual Layer, Creative 5.1 Sound, 19" NEC MultiSync 90GX2
GreenMachine is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On