Computers| Computers |
|
11-03-2006, 11:35 AM
| #2 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,170
|  Well, despite the typos and lies, I guess it was an okay review? It didn't have any benchmarks, but it did include a photo that made it look dirty. I don't like it, to be honest. "Best and latest processor" = Athlon 64 3500+ ??? |
|
|
11-04-2006, 08:20 PM
| #4 (permalink) | ||
| Banned Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,947
 | Quote:
There were no typos or lies. It is an OK review. And at least i completed the review in PDF... Having a review without a photo is like having a recipe without the amounts that you need...its pointless. For $380, what processor is better? 3.1 Ghz Celeron? Nothing is better for the price. Quote:
Anything is better than that Celeron. The Celeron wasn't that bad, but the computer was incomplete, crappy quality, and just plain slow. I mean...Celeron M's are OK. | ||
|
|
|
03-23-2007, 03:10 PM
| #6 (permalink) |
| Ultra Techie  Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 919
 | Re: Review for Acer T160 You kind of contradict yourself: "This computer comes with the best and latest processor, the AMD Athlon 3500. This processor will do a lot of photo editing and light gaming" The best and latest AMD processor can do much more than photo editing and light gaming.
__________________  |
|
|
|
08-14-2007, 03:24 AM
| #7 (permalink) |
| True Techie  Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 180
| Re: Review for Acer T160 Not to mention with the latest ability to not provide a Windows reinstallation disc when originally bought. Acer makes me puke. I despise corporations that try to man-handle people like these guys. |
|
|
Linear Mode
