Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Closed Thread
Old 09-20-2007, 11:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
djmaddogfreak's Avatar
 
True Techie

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: Waterbury, CT

Posts: 121

djmaddogfreak is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to djmaddogfreak Send a message via Skype™ to djmaddogfreak
Default Usb 3.0

Check this out...


The "SuperSpeed" USB Promotions Group was announced Tuesday at the Intel Developer Forum. The promotions group will get together with contributors over the next year to finalize a USB 3.0 spec that will, they hope, take care of our wired peripheral and syncing needs for another five years or more.
ADVERTISEMENT

USB 3.0 is built upon, and is backwards-compatible with, the USB 2.0 "High Speed" spec. It would be generous to even call the specifications "early" at this stage, but the group still had lots of information about how USB 3.0 will work and what features it will provide. The spec should be finalized sometime in the middle of 2008, with initial devices available in '09, and broad deployment by 2010.

The main two goals of SuperSpeed USB are to provide a 10X boost in transfer rate (from 480-Mbits/s in USB 2.0 to 4.8 Gbits/s in USB 3.0), while dramatically lowering power consumption. One example of their speed goals is to transfer a 27GB HD movie to a portable device in 70 seconds. The same thing would take 15 minutes or more with HighSpeed USB (2.0). The SuperSpeed devices will use the same connectors and the same programming and device models as existing devices.

Consider that it takes maybe one or two tenths of a second to transfer a typical 4 Mbyte song to a portable music player with today's USB 2.0. That's "fast enough" for some users, but just try to fill up that 80-Gbyte iPod and you might as well walk away and cook dinner while you wait: 3,000 songs would take perhaps 400 to 600 seconds – up to 10 minutes.

Nobody wants to sit at their computer for that long, but if you could get it to under a minute, you're on to something. That's the performance aim of USB 3.0.
__________________
System Specs:
ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe Mobo
AMD X2 64 bit 4600+ O.C. 15%(from 2.40 GHz to 2.65 GHZ)
4X1GB Crucial Ballistic Tracer O.C. to 880 MHz @ 4-4-4-12
2 - 500 Gig Seagate 7200 RPM HDDs
2 - 160 GB WD 7200 RPM HDD in RAID 0
NVidia GeForce 8800 GT with 512 megs of RAM
Liquid Cooled Processor
Windows Vista Ultimate 64
My Business
djmaddogfreak is offline  
Old 09-21-2007, 02:40 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 1,733

TheEnd187 is an unknown quantity at this point

Default Re: Usb 3.0

bs it takes my WDMYBOOK like 1 1/2hrs to transfer 4Gb. So 27Gb in70 mins would benice even with usb2.0
TheEnd187 is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My main board cant recognise USB hubs...?! anthegreat Hardware Troubleshooting 1 09-20-2007 03:59 PM
external usb hard drive hip39 Hardware Troubleshooting 0 09-19-2007 06:17 PM
USB 2.0 problems haroldthesage Hardware Troubleshooting 0 09-18-2007 12:31 AM
USB Network Adapter Range ??? Katmandu Computer Networking & Internet Access 3 09-16-2007 01:03 AM
USB Flash Drive with Capacity Meter vernong1992 Articles 5 09-12-2007 05:33 PM