Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Closed Thread
Old 02-20-2006, 10:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Wizard Techie

Join Date: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,346

Tyler1989

Default 29.9 nm Processor Technology!

IBM researchers announced that they have found a way to extend a key chip-manufacturing process to generate smaller chip circuits, potentially postponing the semiconductor industry's high-risk conversion to an extremely expensive alternative.

IBM scientists created the smallest, high-quality line patterns ever made using deep-ultraviolet (DUV, 193 nm) optical lithography, a technology currently used to essentially "print" circuits on chips. The distinct and uniformly spaced ridges are 29.9 nm wide. This is less than one-third the size of the 90-nanometer features now in mass production and below the 32 nanometers that industry consensus held as the limit for optical lithography techniques.

The semiconductor industry has so far relied on continually shrinking circuits to drive increases in the performance and function of chips and the products that use them. But as chip features approach the fundamental scale limits of individual atoms and molecules, this method cannot continue in the future for very long. IBM's new result indicates that a "high-index immersion" variant of DUV lithography may buy the industry time.

"Our goal is to push optical lithography as far as we can so the industry does not have to move to any expensive alternatives until absolutely necessary," said Dr. Robert D. Allen, manager of lithography materials at IBM's Almaden Research Center. "This result is the strongest evidence to date that the industry may have at least seven years of breathing room before any radical changes in chip-making techniques would be needed."

The record-small pattern of well-defined and equally spaced 29.9-nm lines and spaces was created on a lithography test apparatus designed and built at IBM Almaden, using new materials developed by its collaborator, JSR Micro (Sunnyvale, California).

"We believe that high-index liquid imaging will enable the extension of today's optical lithography through the 45- and 32-nm technology nodes," said Mark Slezak, technical manager of JSR Micro Inc. "Our industry faces tough questions about which lithography technology will allow us to be successful below 32 nm. This new result gives us another data point favoring the continuation of optical immersion lithography."

Microelectronic chips are made by a process called photolithography, which is similar in concept to silk-screening, except it uses light instead of paint or ink. Photolithography transfers the various circuit design patterns onto a silicon wafer by projecting a uniform beam of laser light through a shadow mask and then focusing it onto a photosensitive "photoresist" material that coats the silicon wafer. Subsequent development, etching and materials deposition steps form the circuit features. Making a typical computer processor or memory chip may require dozens of photolithography cycles.

Over the years, the industry has created smaller circuit features, which typically lead to smaller, faster and cheaper electronics, by using ever-shorter wavelengths of light, stronger lenses and most recently, inserting between the final lens and the silicon wafer a liquid, currently water, that enables even finer resolution.

Until now, it was not known if the industry could continue to adapt this optical immersion technique to produce sharp features smaller than 32 nm. New materials required to make such small features were thought to be incompatible with each other or capable of yielding only indistinct, blurred patterns. As a result, in recent years contingency plans are being explored for switching sometime in the future to a radically different, but much more expensive and still unproven manufacturing method that uses soft-x-rays (also known as EUV, for extreme ultraviolet light) and mirrors rather than laser light and lenses.

As part of its efforts to extend current optical lithography techniques, IBM developed an interference immersion lithography test apparatus, called NEMO. IBM's NEMO tool uses two intersecting laser beams to create light-and-dark interference patterns with spacings closer than can be made with current chip-making apparatus. As a result, NEMO is ideal for researching, testing and optimizing the various high-index fluids and photoresists being considered for use in those future DUV systems that would create such fine features. Now that IBM's new result shows a path for extending optical lithography, high-index lens materials must be developed to enable its commercial viability.

When light passes through a transparent material, it slows down in proportion to the material's "refractive index". Light passing through a higher-index material has a shorter wavelength and can thus be focused more tightly. Resolution in immersion lithography is limited by the lowest refractive index of the final lens, fluid and photoresist materials.

In IBM's NEMO experiments, the lens and fluid had indices of about 1.6, and the photoresist's index of refraction was 1.7. Future research is aimed at developing lens, fluid and photoresist materials with indices of refraction of 1.9, which would enable even smaller features to be imaged.
__________________
<form action=\"http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php\" method=\"get\">
<input type=\"text\" name=\"search\"> <input type=\"submit\" name=\"submit\" value=\"Search TF before you post!\"></form>
Vista Discussion | 64 Bit Discussion |Microsoft Homepage | Yo Linux | Paul Thurrott | Fire Fox | Thunder Bird | Image Shack | Photo Bucket | Put File | Anti-Spyware | MS Anti-Spyware | Trillian | Anti-Virus | On Line Virus Scan
Tyler1989 is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 12:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Mr. Switch's Avatar
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 1,695

Mr. Switch is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Mr. Switch
Default

Well WOOPTIE-FREAKIN'-DOO!!!!!!!

I'VE BEEN WAITING MY ENTIRE LIFE FOR THIS MOMENT!!!!!!

But really, thats cool. when will these reach the consumer? Probably not for very long considering that were at 90nm now and 65nm is just around the corner.

BTW, "We believe that high-index liquid imaging will enable the extension of today's optical lithography through the 45- and 32-nm technology nodes," translates into BLAH BLAH BLAH for me. lol
Mr. Switch is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 11:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Wizard Techie

Join Date: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,346

Tyler1989

Default

The new ones already use 65 such as the Intel Extrme 955 as for this new technology if it's invented what will stop them I can only see production costs.
__________________
<form action=\"http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php\" method=\"get\">
<input type=\"text\" name=\"search\"> <input type=\"submit\" name=\"submit\" value=\"Search TF before you post!\"></form>
Vista Discussion | 64 Bit Discussion |Microsoft Homepage | Yo Linux | Paul Thurrott | Fire Fox | Thunder Bird | Image Shack | Photo Bucket | Put File | Anti-Spyware | MS Anti-Spyware | Trillian | Anti-Virus | On Line Virus Scan
Tyler1989 is offline  
Old 03-16-2006, 11:53 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
Newb Techie

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 3

brad211987

Default confused

Could someone explain to me the differences in 90nm and 65nm, I don't know much about it and am having trouble finding information on the internet. Also, can you use a processor that supports 90nm in a board that says it supports 65nm?
brad211987 is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 04:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
SHAWN's Avatar
 
Field Engineer

Join Date: Nov 2004

Location: Long Island, NY

Posts: 4,687

SHAWN is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to SHAWN
Default

We wont see this technology for some time...
__________________
A+, Network + and MCP
Specs: AMD Athlon X2 3800+ @ 2.6GHz, DFi NF4 Ultra-d, 2GB DDR400, 2x80GB WD Sata in Raid 0, 7600gt, WXPP SP3
Downloads: View CPU, RAM, Cache and Speed specs w/CPU-ID ~ Memory Tester ~ Fraps ~
Free Spyware Scan ~ Spy Sweeper - Trial ~ Free Virus Scan ~ Diskeeper (Defrag Tool) ~
Firefox Browser ~ How to do a Repair Install for Windows 2000/XP ~ CPU's: Intel vs AMD ~

SHAWN is offline  
Old 03-17-2006, 09:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Newb Techie

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 3

brad211987

Default

I probably should have made a new thread for this as I'm not really asking about the 29.9 nm, I simply dont know what any of it means beyond that nm is a measurement.
brad211987 is offline  
Old 04-01-2006, 11:01 AM   #7 (permalink)
Disillusion's Avatar
 
\m/ Metalhead \m/

Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 801

Disillusion

Default

I'm still trying to understand why smaller automatically means better. Can they make them faster when they are smaller or what?
__________________
CPU: Intel Q6600 B3 @ 3.0 GHz
Cooler: Tuniq Tower 120
Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
RAM: G.Skill 4 GB DDR2 800
GPU: EVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512 MB
HDD: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 160 GB
PSU: OCZ StealthXStream 600W
Case: Cooler Master Centurion 5
Disillusion is offline  
Old 04-01-2006, 05:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 3,480

maroon1 is on a distinguished road

Default

smaller is better because when it is smaller u can put more in a chip.
maroon1 is offline  
Old 04-02-2006, 05:15 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Ultra Techie

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 506

cedjunior is on a distinguished road

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by OpticalIllusion
I'm still trying to understand why smaller automatically means better. Can they make them faster when they are smaller or what?
Faster, cooler running, less power consumption.
cedjunior is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On