[backup287]

Just saw them both, heard they were great movies and are highly rated. imdb said no country for old men had quote: "Won 4 Oscars. Another 83 wins & 28 nominations" and also said that There will be Blood had quote: "Won 2 Oscars. Another 43 wins & 35 nominations"

but i dont understand the main point of either of these movies personally i think they are both really boring and are a waste of time to watch, i enjoyed I am Legend alot more than these "deep" storyline movies, why do so many people enjoy these 2 movies? what do u guys think

[taintedplay]

i semi liked no country for old men, but, there will be blood was the dumbest slowest movie ever. 3 hours of watching a guy sitting on a log, watching a fire.

[backup287]

ya at least in no counrty there was action and violence

[CntdwnToExtn]

no country was boring.
i watch whatever the critics say sucks, because 90% of the time the movies are actually good.

[backup287]

oh man just saw the mist now man that was a good movie i cant believe the ending lmao

[Poizen22]

v for vendeta was great and it had bad ratings had liek 3 stars in the canadian capitols paper, (ottawa citizen)

[backup287]

wow juno was also a really bad movie, i heard it was good but it was probally just a chick movie cause it was about pregnancy...lame idc bout that stuff