|  | |
08-31-2005, 11:03 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 13,739
| SPI and NAT firewalls about 2 weeks ago, I got a wireless router, and a wireless card for the Laptop
I secured it all, using WPA PSK + AES encryption, MAC filtering, and turning on SPI (it automatically runs NAT)
when I looked in its log, I found that it has blocked a CRAPLOAD of hackers. I mean, probabbly a hundred at least just for today.
I was really surprised that there were so many hackers trying to get in.
because of the sheer large volume of hackers the router has blocked, I was very impressed. I very much recommend people who use the internet a lot to invest in a router with SPI and NAT. they work really well.
I did a lookup on basically what they do, and this is the gist of it:
SPI - this blocks everybody from the internet from getting to your network, unless you have initiated the connection
NAT - this hides your network from internet users.
__________________ 1 + 1 = 3 if you define 3 as a result of 1 + 1 |
| |
08-31-2005, 11:48 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Lord Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 8,025
| I get a hit at least once a minute on my connection.
A properly configured firewall is even better, using a cisco router myself after learning what the **** I am doing, I can just feel the POWER. |
| |
08-31-2005, 01:32 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 1,574
| Yeah SPI, or Stateful Packet Inspection, is all you need on a home network. It stops pretty much everything. People mostly run port scans. That will be what you're seeing. You don't need a Cisco firewall because it usually won't stop any more than a home router firewall. It just has more throughput and is more configurable.
Having said that having a Cisco firewall would be cool. Chris where did you get it from? They're pretty expensive things. |
| |
08-31-2005, 01:52 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Lord Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 8,025
| I got it from a cannot tell location, since I am not paying the full price, nor am I really paying for the software.
This one is only 500ish USD dollars however. |
| |
08-31-2005, 01:55 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Ultra Techie Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Minnesota Posts: 962
| Yes, ONLY 500 USD. Pshhhhhh I got that in my pocket right now.
__________________ Desktop: Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.4, Asus P5B-E, 3GB G. Skill DDR2 800, eVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512MB, 22" LG, 19" NEC
Laptop: HP Pavilion dv9500, Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2.0, 3GB G. Skill DDR2 667, nVidia 8600 M GS 512MB, 17" |
| |
08-31-2005, 02:19 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 1,522
| Yeah. But typical h/w firewalls don't really protect you from trojans.. Since the connection could be "started" from inside your system.
It's still essential though.. |
| |
08-31-2005, 02:22 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Lord Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 8,025
| Quote: Originally posted by Chankama Yeah. But typical h/w firewalls don't really protect you from trojans.. Since the connection could be "started" from inside your system.
It's still essential though.. | You can strictly deny access to all trojan ports so they cant do anything.
I have to learn how to do that. |
| |
08-31-2005, 02:29 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 1,522
| A good trojan won't restrict themselves to certain ports  . So unless you know what to look for, you can't tell what to block. Of course, you could "find" out the characteristics of the trojan by various methods. But, I doubt if it is possible just by external means with a h/w router.
I mean. I could write a trojan that pretends to be a legitimate program - in the eyes of external entity (h/w router) to the computer is concerned, as they don't provide you application level security. |
| |
09-01-2005, 01:54 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 13,739
| my router has application level security aswell
I have the D-Link DI-524
__________________ 1 + 1 = 3 if you define 3 as a result of 1 + 1 |
| |
09-01-2005, 03:11 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 1,522
| I doubt it man.
From their website: Quote: |
Some firewall features include functions that allow or disallow certain ports to be open for certain applications.
| This might be somewhat misleading. For example, ZoneAlarm I believe takes a keyed hash of the trusted executable and stores it in its database. When an .exe tries to access the internet, it compares to see if the keyed hash is in its db or not.
With a external entity, such a mechanism cannot be done as far as I know. You'd need some software running on the system that does something like what ZA does. |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |