Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyboy123x ticket 1 was speeding - 37 in a 25 zone (ticket written for 35 in a 25 zone though)... argument would be something like how it was on top of a hill, i was unexperienced at driving blah blah as well as my speedometer was broken |
first of all, 4 mph difference from speedo would still put you at 33 in a 25 which is still speeding.
second, you CANNOT go in there and give them a reason WHY you were speeding...ESPECIALLY not a reason like "i'm unexperienced". if you give excuses, then you're admitting to the crime.
the court doesnt care why you were speeding, just like they dont care why so-and-so murdered his wife. the law was broken, period.
Quote:
|
ticket 2 was breaking an intermidiate license law (out past curfew) - they cant pull you over for it but this guy did. my argument would be something along the lines of how he had no reason to pull me over but i'll check things to make sure that would hold up. Also he made a few mistakes and said he saw me going the other way on the street and that i was speeding so thats why he followed me - might have something to do with the speedometer mistake too because i was going exactly 35mph
|
this would require a lot of doing to prove (because he didnt write you a ticket for speeding, so its not documented) and only would MAYBE get you out of it. the fact is, however, you were still out past curfew and unless you can prove, without a doubt, that the cop had no right to pull you over, you won't get out of it. i'll wager my entire savings account that you can't. it's the cop's word against yours.
i'll say good luck just in case you do try to fight this, but i would just recommend taking a driving class for one and asking for adjudication withheld for the other. if you do this successfully, you won't get the points on your license.