Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Computer Forums > Miscellaneous > Off Topic Discussion » scanners, color dpi, questions, concerns, beef jerky
Closed Thread
Old 02-12-2006, 12:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Sep 2005

Location: /home/jason

Posts: 1,837

Jayce will become famous soon enoughJayce will become famous soon enough

Send a message via AIM to Jayce
Default scanners, color dpi, questions, concerns, beef jerky

I've got an all in 1 epson scanner. It's pretty spiffy. I was scanning some pictures and after I scanned about 50 or 60 I came to realize I wasn't that happy with the sharpness. So I went into professional mode and saw the dpi was set to 300. I adjusted it to 9,600 but I got an error. I brought it back down to 1,200 and started printing.

Took 10 minutes and I'm awaiting the results but, I'm wondering something. If I set this to 1,200, would that adjust much else besides the sharpness of the picture? I just wanted some assurance on this since I know very little about printers and scanners.

EDIT - Also, what's the best options here?

I have 24 bit, 8 bit, or color smoothing... which is the ideal option?

Also, as far as resolution, I have about 25 options in dpi choices, ranging anywhere from 50 to 9,600. What to choose, what to choose.
__________________
Go open source, or go home.
Jayce is online now  
Old 02-12-2006, 12:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Super Techie

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 398

kostas

Default

Beef jerky is called biltong in South Africa and if you find good quality, it's pretty good!
__________________

kostas is offline  
Old 02-12-2006, 09:50 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Sep 2005

Location: /home/jason

Posts: 1,837

Jayce will become famous soon enoughJayce will become famous soon enough

Send a message via AIM to Jayce
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by kostas
Beef jerky is called biltong in South Africa and if you find good quality, it's pretty good!
Uh, yeah. So, any serious comments-- PLEASE?!?!
__________________
Go open source, or go home.
Jayce is online now  
Old 02-12-2006, 09:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
Trotter's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: The South

Posts: 19,986

Trotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to all

Default

600 works good, 1200 works better but as you can tell it takes a lot longer.

The higher the DPI scanned, the bigger the file it makes.
__________________
R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter , 14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009




DFI LanParty-UT SLI-D - Windows 7 64-bit - AMD Athlon X2 4200+ w/CNPS9500
4GB RAM(4x1GB) - Razer Lachesis - EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 896MB


>>>> I am looking for donated DDR2 (link) <<<<

< < < < < If I've been helpful, rep me. . . .
Trotter is offline  
Old 02-12-2006, 10:19 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Sep 2005

Location: /home/jason

Posts: 1,837

Jayce will become famous soon enoughJayce will become famous soon enough

Send a message via AIM to Jayce
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Trotter
600 works good, 1200 works better but as you can tell it takes a lot longer.

The higher the DPI scanned, the bigger the file it makes.
I was hoping that along with the bigger file, which doesn't matter to me, I'd get a better quality scan. I scanned a picture at 300 dpi, and the same picture at 1200 dpi, and compared it directly to the original one from a disposable camera. The 300 and 1200 looked identicle, just... identicle. Down to the last little pixel that my eyes could see. The disposable one though... looked great. I can't seem to win...
__________________
Go open source, or go home.
Jayce is online now  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On