Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Closed Thread
Old 11-19-2003, 03:22 AM   #1 (permalink)
Apokalipse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2003

Location: Melbourne, Australia

Posts: 13,739

Apokalipse has a spectacular aura aboutApokalipse has a spectacular aura about

Default IQ test

test your IQ at http://www.iqtest.com
then post what you get
__________________

1 + 1 = 3 if you define 3 as a result of 1 + 1
Apokalipse is offline  
Old 11-19-2003, 03:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Apokalipse's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2003

Location: Melbourne, Australia

Posts: 13,739

Apokalipse has a spectacular aura aboutApokalipse has a spectacular aura about

Default

this is what they emailed me:
"Thank you for recently taking the Self Discovery Workshop's IQ Test.
Because of the Internet's ability to mishandle transmissions, we are reconfirming via email that your IQ Test score was: 156"
__________________

1 + 1 = 3 if you define 3 as a result of 1 + 1
Apokalipse is offline  
Old 11-19-2003, 04:47 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
True Techie

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 127

fiezk

Default

Sorry to say it pal, but they are probably giving too high scores. Many of these sites do this because if are happy with your result you are more likely to buy their evaluations..
fiezk is offline  
Old 11-19-2003, 06:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,179

Emily is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Emily
Default

"Thank you for recently taking the Self Discovery Workshop's IQ Test.
Because of the Internet's ability to mishandle transmissions, we are
reconfirming via email that your IQ Test score was: 161"

But like that other guy said, I don't think that's right.. The test seemed pretty easy to me. And it can't be that accurate if you have a 50% chance of getting 100% (since all the question are true-false)
__________________
<a href=\"http://www.upstark.com\">www.upstark.com</a>
Emily is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 06:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Super Techie

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 386

chesman

Send a message via ICQ to chesman Send a message via Yahoo to chesman
Default

ya, that test is not veryvalid at all, i got this:

Thank you for recently taking the Self Discovery Workshop's IQ Test.
Because of the Internet's ability to mishandle transmissions, we are
reconfirming via email that your IQ Test score was: 148

and i am no genius, lol, but thats what it says i am, hehe
__________________
WinXP Pro
P4 2.5 Ghz/socket 478/400FSB/512L2
512 megs PC800 Rambus
ABIT TH7II-Raid mobo
128MB Nvidia FX 5200 Home Theatre w/TV out and Remote
80 Gig Western Digital/8mb Cache/7200 RPM\'s
20 gig Fujitsu/2mb Cache/5400 RPM\'s
48x40x48/16X Dvd/CD-Burner
chesman is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 06:40 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
True Techie

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 127

fiezk

Default

People believe what they want to believe...
fiezk is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 08:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Qiranworms's Avatar
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 1,637

Qiranworms is on a distinguished road

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Emily
But like that other guy said, I don't think that's right.. The test seemed pretty easy to me. And it can't be that accurate if you have a 50% chance of getting 100% (since all the question are true-false)

That's not true. This is not how probability works. With true and false, the chances decrease with each following question. Ok. That made no sense. I'll explain. You have one 50/50 question. You have a 1 in 2 chance of getting it. If you have two 1 in 2 questions, you have a 1 in 4 chance of getting them both right. Add a third...your chances of getting them ALL right is 1 in 8.

The reason for this, is the fact that EACH ONE OF THEM has to have that 1 in 2 chance to the benefit. So basically, (1/2)(1/2)=(1/4). Or as an equation, (x/y)<to the power of the number of questions>=total probability, when "x" is the numerator and "y" is the denominator of the fraction representing the probability of an individual question, ie. in this case of true and false, 1/2, which is of course 50%. You can do something similar for multiple choice (a typical question is a-d therefore a 1 in 4 chance of getting it).


*****

Tell me if I am making any sense.
__________________
-->Marc
Error: Keyboard not attached. Please press F1 to continue. <pre>-------OS----------Gentoo Linux-------<br>------Browser-----Mozilla Firefox-----</pre><form action="http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php" method="get"><input type="text" name="search"> <input type="submit" name="submit" value="Search the Forums, thanks to Emily"></form>

|||Official Forum Rules|||<hr>
Qiranworms is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 08:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
True Techie

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 127

fiezk

Default

an easier way of writing this is:

(1/x)^n

where x is the number of opions to your multiple-choice question, and n is the number of questions.
fiezk is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 10:17 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,179

Emily is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Emily
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by qiranworms
That's not true. This is not how probability works. With true and false, the chances decrease with each following question. Ok. That made no sense. I'll explain. You have one 50/50 question. You have a 1 in 2 chance of getting it. If you have two 1 in 2 questions, you have a 1 in 4 chance of getting them both right. Add a third...your chances of getting them ALL right is 1 in 8.

The reason for this, is the fact that EACH ONE OF THEM has to have that 1 in 2 chance to the benefit. So basically, (1/2)(1/2)=(1/4). Or as an equation, (x/y)<to the power of the number of questions>=total probability, when "x" is the numerator and "y" is the denominator of the fraction representing the probability of an individual question, ie. in this case of true and false, 1/2, which is of course 50%. You can do something similar for multiple choice (a typical question is a-d therefore a 1 in 4 chance of getting it).


*****

Tell me if I am making any sense.
Oops. My bad. But my point was that you have a greater chance at getting a high score on a true/false test than on an open-ended test or one with more than 2 multiple choice answers per question.

P.S. Just so you don't think I'm a complete idiot I was trying to get at the fact that you have a 50% chance of getting any given question correct. Just had some kind of brain fart along the way.
Emily is offline  
Old 11-20-2003, 10:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Qiranworms's Avatar
 
Monster Techie

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 1,637

Qiranworms is on a distinguished road

Default

The whole test is junk anyway (tried it...didn't like it that much...rushed through it in about 10 minutes without looking to check my answers...wasn't worth that kind of effort). Skips many areas professional IQ tests examine in detail. It not only inflates the scores, but people with more of the certain areas of intelligence it does examine will do better then people who are worse in those areas but may have a higher overall IQ. And to think it says that professional tests usually score within five points...:laughing: ...oh, and I got 165 by the way.

Quote:
Originally posted by Emily
P.S. Just so you don't think I'm a complete idiot I was trying to get at the fact that you have a 50% chance of getting any given question correct. Just had some kind of brain fart along the way.
Don't worry. I understand perfectly.


And this is about the 20th time I've edited this post...I keep making stupid spelling and other mistakes.
__________________
-->Marc
Error: Keyboard not attached. Please press F1 to continue. <pre>-------OS----------Gentoo Linux-------<br>------Browser-----Mozilla Firefox-----</pre><form action="http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php" method="get"><input type="text" name="search"> <input type="submit" name="submit" value="Search the Forums, thanks to Emily"></form>

|||Official Forum Rules|||<hr>
Qiranworms is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On