|  | |
11-19-2003, 03:22 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 13,739
| IQ test test your IQ at http://www.iqtest.com
then post what you get
__________________ 1 + 1 = 3 if you define 3 as a result of 1 + 1 |
| |
11-19-2003, 03:23 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 13,739
| this is what they emailed me:
"Thank you for recently taking the Self Discovery Workshop's IQ Test.
Because of the Internet's ability to mishandle transmissions, we are reconfirming via email that your IQ Test score was: 156"
__________________ 1 + 1 = 3 if you define 3 as a result of 1 + 1 |
| |
11-19-2003, 04:47 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
True Techie Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 127
| Sorry to say it pal, but they are probably giving too high scores. Many of these sites do this because if are happy with your result you are more likely to buy their evaluations.. |
| |
11-19-2003, 06:56 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,179
| "Thank you for recently taking the Self Discovery Workshop's IQ Test.
Because of the Internet's ability to mishandle transmissions, we are
reconfirming via email that your IQ Test score was: 161"
But like that other guy said, I don't think that's right.. The test seemed pretty easy to me. And it can't be that accurate if you have a 50% chance of getting 100% (since all the question are true-false)
__________________ <a href=\"http://www.upstark.com\">www.upstark.com</a> |
| |
11-20-2003, 06:26 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Super Techie Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 386
| ya, that test is not veryvalid at all, i got this:
Thank you for recently taking the Self Discovery Workshop's IQ Test.
Because of the Internet's ability to mishandle transmissions, we are
reconfirming via email that your IQ Test score was: 148
and i am no genius, lol, but thats what it says i am, hehe
__________________ WinXP Pro
P4 2.5 Ghz/socket 478/400FSB/512L2
512 megs PC800 Rambus
ABIT TH7II-Raid mobo
128MB Nvidia FX 5200 Home Theatre w/TV out and Remote
80 Gig Western Digital/8mb Cache/7200 RPM\'s
20 gig Fujitsu/2mb Cache/5400 RPM\'s
48x40x48/16X Dvd/CD-Burner |
| |
11-20-2003, 06:40 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
True Techie Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 127
| People believe what they want to believe... |
| |
11-20-2003, 08:20 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,637
| Quote: Originally posted by Emily But like that other guy said, I don't think that's right.. The test seemed pretty easy to me. And it can't be that accurate if you have a 50% chance of getting 100% (since all the question are true-false) |
That's not true. This is not how probability works. With true and false, the chances decrease with each following question. Ok. That made no sense. I'll explain. You have one 50/50 question. You have a 1 in 2 chance of getting it. If you have two 1 in 2 questions, you have a 1 in 4 chance of getting them both right. Add a third...your chances of getting them ALL right is 1 in 8.
The reason for this, is the fact that EACH ONE OF THEM has to have that 1 in 2 chance to the benefit. So basically, (1/2)(1/2)=(1/4). Or as an equation, (x/y)<to the power of the number of questions>=total probability, when "x" is the numerator and "y" is the denominator of the fraction representing the probability of an individual question, ie. in this case of true and false, 1/2, which is of course 50%. You can do something similar for multiple choice (a typical question is a-d therefore a 1 in 4 chance of getting it).
*****
Tell me if I am making any sense.
__________________ -->Marc Error: Keyboard not attached. Please press F1 to continue. <pre>-------OS----------Gentoo Linux-------<br>------Browser-----Mozilla Firefox-----</pre><form action="http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php" method="get"><input type="text" name="search"> <input type="submit" name="submit" value="Search the Forums, thanks to Emily"></form>  |||Official Forum Rules|||<hr> |
| |
11-20-2003, 08:40 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
True Techie Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 127
| an easier way of writing this is:
(1/x)^n
where x is the number of opions to your multiple-choice question, and n is the number of questions. |
| |
11-20-2003, 10:17 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,179
| Quote: Originally posted by qiranworms That's not true. This is not how probability works. With true and false, the chances decrease with each following question. Ok. That made no sense. I'll explain. You have one 50/50 question. You have a 1 in 2 chance of getting it. If you have two 1 in 2 questions, you have a 1 in 4 chance of getting them both right. Add a third...your chances of getting them ALL right is 1 in 8.
The reason for this, is the fact that EACH ONE OF THEM has to have that 1 in 2 chance to the benefit. So basically, (1/2)(1/2)=(1/4). Or as an equation, (x/y)<to the power of the number of questions>=total probability, when "x" is the numerator and "y" is the denominator of the fraction representing the probability of an individual question, ie. in this case of true and false, 1/2, which is of course 50%. You can do something similar for multiple choice (a typical question is a-d therefore a 1 in 4 chance of getting it).
*****
Tell me if I am making any sense. | Oops. My bad. But my point was that you have a greater chance at getting a high score on a true/false test than on an open-ended test or one with more than 2 multiple choice answers per question.
P.S. Just so you don't think I'm a complete idiot I was trying to get at the fact that you have a 50% chance of getting any given question correct. Just had some kind of brain fart along the way. |
| |
11-20-2003, 10:26 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Monster Techie Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,637
| The whole test is junk anyway (tried it...didn't like it that much...rushed through it in about 10 minutes without looking to check my answers...wasn't worth that kind of effort). Skips many areas professional IQ tests examine in detail. It not only inflates the scores, but people with more of the certain areas of intelligence it does examine will do better then people who are worse in those areas but may have a higher overall IQ. And to think it says that professional tests usually score within five points...:laughing: ...oh, and I got 165 by the way. Quote: Originally posted by Emily P.S. Just so you don't think I'm a complete idiot I was trying to get at the fact that you have a 50% chance of getting any given question correct. Just had some kind of brain fart along the way. | Don't worry. I understand perfectly.
And this is about the 20th time I've edited this post...I keep making stupid spelling and other mistakes.
__________________ -->Marc Error: Keyboard not attached. Please press F1 to continue. <pre>-------OS----------Gentoo Linux-------<br>------Browser-----Mozilla Firefox-----</pre><form action="http://www.srsyo.org/tfsearch.php" method="get"><input type="text" name="search"> <input type="submit" name="submit" value="Search the Forums, thanks to Emily"></form>  |||Official Forum Rules|||<hr> |
| |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |