[beedubaya]

I had a GeForce MX 440 IGP on my old HP computer paired with an Athlon XP 2600+. When I tried to upgrade, i discovered that the HP proprietary 150W PSU wouldn't support a true graphics card, and I could not use any other PSU with that computer, so thats when I decided I would never buy manufactured again.

The X300 is better...but the 6200 is better yet. The 6200 is fully DX9 compliant, while its probably not powerful enough to even use its features.

[Apokalipse]

not the "turbocache" version, but the others are alright

[Mr 1337]

The X300 is better...but the 6200 is better yet. The 6200 is fully DX9 compliant, while its probably not powerful enough to even use its features.

I made my 5600ultra scream so i wonder what i could do w/ a 6200?:beard: Id say the x300 cause the Nvidia card is crap.

[nuke]

of course geforce is much better.

[Mr 1337]

Just because its a geforce dosent mean its better.

[Lancaster]

omg thankyou apokalipse,
ive been trying to tell that to my friend who has a 256mb card and is always say that his card is twice as good as my 128mb card.

[Mr 1337]

I think if you think just cause it has more ram its better then your an idiot. IMO.

[PZEROFGH]

4000 ppl. its a dream card for a P4 EE with 2 GBs of ram lol. i read that on a review. looks like he got the wrong card