Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Computer Forums > Miscellaneous > Off Topic Discussion » The end of net neutrality = bad
Closed Thread
Old 07-08-2007, 08:07 PM   #11 (permalink)
 
Banned

Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: United States of America

Posts: 109

Enterpriser is an unknown quantity at this point

Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

Quote:
Originally Posted by fade2black2004 View Post
idc if someone is trying to upload their will and im just trying to upload my porn.
i pay for my internet just like they do and i should be allowed to do with it what i want
What if you were the benefactor of that will, and it was leaving 100s of gigs of porn for you?
Enterpriser is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 09:03 PM   #12 (permalink)
fade2black2004's Avatar
 
Console Gamer

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 2,612

fade2black2004 is an unknown quantity at this point

Send a message via AIM to fade2black2004
Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

doesnt matter i pay for my internet just like everyone else
if they dont like their internet speed make them pay for better internet speed
fade2black2004 is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 09:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
bmxfreakrider's Avatar
 
G33K P0W3R!!!!

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: HickTown, California (hesperia), and West Hollywood

Posts: 2,059

bmxfreakrider is on a distinguished road

Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

i way agree. I use my internet almost with no mercy, 24/7, constant downloading on p2p apps

all while browsing the internet. I pay for it, so I use it.

that makes me wonder. If this thing goes thru, will it slow down P2P apps?
__________________
Listen to my music! and random/funny videos XD
Need a HDTV? Come find me at BestBuy #393 in West Hollywood XD
-----v Just pwnt my cpu, 900mhz OC v-----

One last thing: Make free money with twitter, and be entered to win $10! Only with twtmob (my 2nd job lol. Really, like $150 a week!)
bmxfreakrider is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 10:25 PM   #14 (permalink)
kfc469's Avatar
 
Ultra Techie

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 924

kfc469

Send a message via AIM to kfc469
Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enterpriser View Post
The original post by kfc469, where is that article from? Seemed a bit bias.
I auctually have no idea I found it on another forum and decided to bring it here. I'm assuming that its from that net neutrality petition site.
__________________

kfc469 is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 10:59 PM   #15 (permalink)
Trotter's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: The South

Posts: 19,975

Trotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to allTrotter is a name known to all

Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

Quote:
If this thing goes thru, will it slow down P2P apps?
Definitely.

There is so much double-speak when it comes to Net Neutrality that neither side makes a lot of sense. In the end, we don't really have a choice.. those we have elected will be making the decission.
__________________
R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter , 14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009




DFI LanParty-UT SLI-D - Windows 7 64-bit - AMD Athlon X2 4200+ w/CNPS9500
4GB RAM(4x1GB) - Razer Lachesis - EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 896MB


>>>> I am looking for donated DDR2 (link) <<<<

< < < < < If I've been helpful, rep me. . . .
Trotter is online now  
Old 07-09-2007, 12:18 AM   #16 (permalink)
Jorsoft's Avatar
 
Wizard Techie

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Minneapolis, MN

Posts: 4,542

Jorsoft will become famous soon enoughJorsoft will become famous soon enough

Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

I strongly feel we should keep the internet neutral rather than handing it's fate over to the major telecom corps. Ensuring net neurtrality will keep the internet just as it is now which is perfect for me. I already pay for a fast connection (which I love). I don't want to pay even more or switch providers or something like that just to make sure I can access what I want at decent speeds. It should remain as is. Giving so much control to these large companies can only be a bad thing. I can't think of any good coming from it.
__________________
Jorsoft is offline  
Old 07-09-2007, 12:33 AM   #17 (permalink)
bmxfreakrider's Avatar
 
G33K P0W3R!!!!

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: HickTown, California (hesperia), and West Hollywood

Posts: 2,059

bmxfreakrider is on a distinguished road

Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

I have 768k download, and I want to keep it that way, unless i upgrade (so I want all my stuff at atleast 90kb/s (even tho ive hit 100 at M$)
__________________
Listen to my music! and random/funny videos XD
Need a HDTV? Come find me at BestBuy #393 in West Hollywood XD
-----v Just pwnt my cpu, 900mhz OC v-----

One last thing: Make free money with twitter, and be entered to win $10! Only with twtmob (my 2nd job lol. Really, like $150 a week!)
bmxfreakrider is offline  
Old 07-09-2007, 01:07 AM   #18 (permalink)
ben_ben's Avatar
 
Super Techie

Join Date: Feb 2006

Posts: 346

ben_ben

Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

i think the internet is fine as it is and i hope this doesn't happen.
ben_ben is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 12:02 PM   #19 (permalink)
 
Wizard Techie

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 4,003

Trifid is on a distinguished road

Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

You are all forgetting you are paying for a shared service. This is a common seeing in the UK. "£25 for a totally unlimited 8Mb Max service." They forget to mention on the ads you get throttled as low as 512 speeds or worse depending on ISP and traffic type. Due to the competitive nature of ADSL in Britain there is a price war of who can offer the cheapest service. All claiming unlimited. Some traffic shape worse than others, some actual have a "Fair Usage Cap" on their unlimited.

The best ISP's have no traffic shaping but have a cap in place. The average price is ~£25 for 30GB. My ISP (Entanet) offers 30GB peak and 300GB offpeak, and as expected for a couple of hours when off peak starts everyone and their dog downloads. Problem right there. A central connecting the BT network (which every non-LLU xDSL ISP will connect the home user to the ISPs network) goes through has a limited amount of bandwidth available. The maximum you can purchase is 622Mb/s. This soon fills up with users who download at 8Mb/s so then what happens? Natural contention will slow users down a bit as it begins to near 99% but after that packet loss happens. No one wants that. Do you want pings of 300ms+? Thought not. I like my 8ms echo reply to the BBC server.

Entanet asked the customers what they wanted. Nearly every person said they didn't want traffic to be prioritised. Nearly all said that something needs to be done. They all accepted that increasing bandwidth was not financially viable at £1.5million a year per central ($3,000,000 per year). Their end result was an Anti-Packet Loss Tool. They took the meaning of MAX DSL to its roots. 2Mbps+. If you get more great! On the ALT it will throttle every user down in 0.5meg steps until bandwidth is reduced to the point no traffic is lost. But this also ensures there is little wasted bandwidth available to the user. This tool will stop at 2Mbps, once throughput has reached acceptable levels (96%) than everyone's speed increases at 256k steps. They let everyone monitor this: Entanet NOC » xDSL Central Pipe

Not sure why I typed this out as I'm sure you don't care about the UK's internet system. Although it is very likely to happen to you. I hope you are able to find a ISP which offers a good deal while being honest.
__________________

Cisco CCNA, Comptia A+
Trifid is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 11:28 PM   #20 (permalink)
advancedgeek's Avatar
 
Ultra Techie

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Posts: 636

advancedgeek is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to advancedgeek Send a message via MSN to advancedgeek Send a message via Yahoo to advancedgeek
Default Re: The end of net neutrality = bad

wait... does this mean everyone would be equal on the internet? as in same download/upload speed for everyone and same latency for everyone and such?
__________________
Graphics card: Inno3D Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS @ 640/940 (core/memory)
MB: Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 v3.3 F12
RAM: 2 Kingston HyperX DDR2 800MHz (4GB total)
CPU: Core 2 Duo E6320 @variable rates (will fix my fan problem soon and overclock high again)
HSF: Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme & Antec Tricool 120mm fan
PSU: Delta Serverpower 550W
HD: Seagate 400GB ST340032AS & Excelstor 80GB (both SATA)
Case: don't know what case it is but it is very crappy
Optical Drive: Lite-on 16X DVD+&- RW DL (died) using a CD-ROM drive until I get a new blu ray burner or whatever i can get


http://web26.hopto.org:443/

**been afk from tech-forums for a while so this is the updates specs**
advancedgeek is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Net Neutrality saladfork Computer Networking & Internet Access 0 05-20-2007 03:25 PM