Quote:
Originally posted by turtile Higher pixel quantity is not always better. A 6MP camera with large, higher quality pixels can print a 20x30 that looks perfect while a 10MP P&S will look like a pile of garbage. |
Bingo. The test you did with the HP and the Nikon don't mean anything. They are completly different systems with different lenses and different size sensors. The difference in detail you see is not from the different sensors, it's a result from better optics on the Nikon. Notice how you see the color fringing on the tree branches? that's becuase the HP has a terrible lens attached to it that doesn't correct for that. That's also why the HP doesnt' have as contrasty of image in comparison.
My 6MP D70 will make better quality images than any 8mp point-n'-shooter simply because I have a larger sensor, and MUCH brighter and sharper lenses. I've seen 12x18 prints done by 3MP camera's that come out just as good as my D70 would - tack sharp.
Quote:
Originally posted by turtile Not heat but the fact that each pixel is smaller causes the noise as well as in camera noise reduction (hardware and software). The smaller the pixel, the less light each pixel can get. |
That too. I said heat becuase the first digital camera had images that got noisier and noisier over time if you left it on beucase the sensor got hot.