|  |
07-25-2005, 12:13 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Junior Techie Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 93
| Linux OS rec. I own a laptop that I use for class and a desktop I use for gaming and I was planning on reformatting my laptop to use Linux.
I've never used Linux before however I want to expand a little bit of my OS knowledge. So, the question I'm asking is what Linux OS do you all recommend? I was leaning more towards Debian but a few ppl i know are also recomending Fedora. (I hear Red Hat has aimed to work more like windows and I dont really want that so no red hat recommendations plz)
Thanks for your help. |
| |
07-25-2005, 01:28 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master Techie Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 2,534
| not much of anything in linux is like windows, never was meant to be, there are some GUI's that are similar to windows for linux though, thats where the similarities end http://www.slackware.com http://www.tldp.org http://www.lowfatlinux.com
if you dont already know alot about computers in general be prepared for a shock, linux assumes you have quite a bit of computer knowledge to begin with, many many folks find this out the hard way, get frustrated and give up
Tech-Forums.net does have a linux/unix forum !!! |
| |
07-25-2005, 02:00 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Junior Techie Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 93
| horndude, I'm a computer science major and I've been using computers for the majority of my life so I know quite a bit about them, its just I dont know about the Linux OS (although I use a Unix email system so a lot of the commands are similiar). But I'm prepared to learn. I was just asking for recommendations. So please feel free to input what you like/dislike about the difference flavors of Linux. |
| |
07-25-2005, 02:06 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Member (again) Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh? Posts: 4,200
| Let's get this out in the open right away:
RH/Fedora BAD!
They're bloated and just act kinda weird. horndude is gonna tell you Slackware, and I suggest it also. It's a very nice distro.
It will be frustrating, I will warn you. |
| |
07-25-2005, 04:33 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master Techie Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 2,534
| Well, part of the problem is all the linux distro's use essentially the same software,and linux is nothing more than a toolchain combined with a kernel that adheres to unix standards.........ie POSIX compliant.
Now, what happens is many people get it in their heads that its like windows so by changing versions you will avoid problems or get what you want, that isnt the case at all, they all are the same underneath.
The differences:
RPM,portage,pkg,and deb-pkg--------these are different pre-compiled binaries that make it easy to install software, most linux distros use one of the above, these allow you to download ready to go binaries like windows uses for example and install them directly, they are nothing more than software install/uninstall scripts
OR with any linux distro that has a compiler installed(most should,many do) you can always compile from the source and install that way
The rest of the differences is how much software a distro has with it, how stable or how much testing has been done on the software before its release, and what versions they used.
Redhat which is now Fedora for desktops is a cutting edge experiment basically, it doesnt come with all that much, uses the RPM pkg management system
Slackware---one of the oldest and original distro's, comes with almost anything you could want, has the biggest user base, uses pkg tool software management without dependency checking
Debian--another one of the originals, many others are based on Debian, it has a big following as well, but development on it lately has become questionable, it may fork soon, it uses deb pkgs and not sure if it does dependency checking or not
Mandrake----similar to what Redhat started,they just took it further, some of it is now payware, lots and lots of automated configuration GUI's, similar to windows in that respect
Gentoo--basically a semi automated version of linux from scratch,uses the portage system for automated download and compilation of software
the rest are mostly clones or "one-offs"
I always recommend slackware, it just plain works and has the best most comprehensive user base and one guy has been in charge of it since the beginning. |
| |
07-25-2005, 05:33 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Wizard Techie Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 3,791
| Quote: |
Tech-Forums.net does have a linux/unix forum !!!
| Yes it does, and that is where this is going
__________________ Intel C2D E6320 / AMD Athlon X2 3800+
Gigabyte 965P DS3 / DFI nF4 Ultra-D
2GB OCZ Gold PC2-6400 / 2GB OCZ Gold PC4000
eVGA 8800GTS 320MB / eVGA 6800GS 256MB
150GB Raptor / 74GB Raptor
2x500GB / 320GB
OCZ GameXStreme 850w / OCZ StealthXStream 600w |
| |
07-25-2005, 06:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Ultra Techie Join Date: May 2005 Location: Townsville, QLD Posts: 640
| Slackware is alright, it's A little complicated... that's what I found
I always say the Same thing to anyone who is going to be learning linux Start with a nice Simple Distro First like Ubuntu and then move your way up to slackware.
Ubuntu is A nice Simple non cluttered distro with only the Basics great Accessability, to apps cause it's not clutterd and very easy to use.
It's great, I'll be switching back to ubuntu as soon as I can be bothered to reload it onto my New machine (had it on the Old PII 350)
Another peice of advice, read all you can about your chosen distro, learn about it dream about it live it, love it. Don't get discouraged and give up on Linux Like I did, prepare yourself first
Jake |
| |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |