ipod nano 2nd gen vs Sansa Mp3

surburban · 12-18-2006, 01:16 PM

which one is better????? Sansa is cheap and good quality and playaback. Nano is Apple................

talldude123 · 12-18-2006, 09:34 PM

Personally, I would choose the Sansa, because Ipod is only compatible with Itunes, not Windows Media Player, which everybody likes to use.

The Ipod has a rechargable battery which is a plus, but it costs alot.

swtwc · 01-02-2007, 02:37 AM

I have the E260. It plays video and is very compatible with everything. Downside, you have to charge with USB port. But my comp is always on so no prblem for me.

12-18-2006, 01:16 PM	#1 (permalink)
surburban Newb Techie Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2	ipod nano 2nd gen vs Sansa Mp3 which one is better????? Sansa is cheap and good quality and playaback. Nano is Apple................

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-18-2006, 09:34 PM	#2 (permalink)
talldude123 Banned Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 7,947	Personally, I would choose the Sansa, because Ipod is only compatible with Itunes, not Windows Media Player, which everybody likes to use. The Ipod has a rechargable battery which is a plus, but it costs alot.

01-02-2007, 02:37 AM	#3 (permalink)
swtwc Junior Techie Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 58	I have the E260. It plays video and is very compatible with everything. Downside, you have to charge with USB port. But my comp is always on so no prblem for me.