Computer Forums

Member Login

Remember Me? Sign Up! | Forgot Password
 
Slogan
 
Closed Thread
Old 04-15-2007, 12:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
Osiris's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: Kentucky

Posts: 32,071

Osiris is a jewel in the roughOsiris is a jewel in the roughOsiris is a jewel in the rough

Send a message via ICQ to Osiris Send a message via AIM to Osiris Send a message via MSN to Osiris Send a message via Yahoo to Osiris Send a message via Skype™ to Osiris
Default How Logistep catches file sharers

It is no secret that companies like Logistep are monitoring p2p networks to sue file sharers who are offering software from clients like Zuxxez, a German company who recently sued 500 British p2p users claiming that they illegally distributed the game Dream Pinball 3D. The website Torrentfreak got their hands on a copy of one of those letters that have been send out which details the process of how Logistep determines which users are illegally distributing the game.
Logistep uses a software called File Sharing Monitor that targets E-Donkey and Gnutella users. Here is how it works:
  • The software connects to a p2p server and requests a filename recording all IP addresses that offer that name
  • They request to download the file and if the download is permitted record the following information into a database
  • Filename, file size, IP of the distributor, P2P protocol, P2P application, the time and the username
  • When this is inserted the application does a automatic whois and is able to send an infringement letter to the ISP
I think it is interesting to note that this is almost an automatic process which leads to some questions. How do they know which archive has the correct size and is actually their product and not a broken archive ? Is not it only possible to know the exact file size if they downloaded it at least once to verify that is is indeed their product ?
Let us assume that they are not stupid and that they filter out every file below a certain size to prevent that users who do share mods or patches get sued. Let us further assume that a file that is labeled a certain way (with group tags) and shared among many users is the right program. Does this mean that the user that they are suing is responsible ? They will always sue the account holder which could or could not be the person who shared the files.
What possible solutions can I think of that make the Logistep file monitor useless ? Please note that this is hypothetic, I’m not advising anyone to actually use the methods listed below.
  • don’t share files
  • share only files with no plausible filename (3dpd)
  • use encryption to share the files
  • use vpns like Relakks to share them
  • switch to Usenet
  • buy the game
Can you think of anything else left to say ?
__________________
Osiris is online now  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
windows xp file sharing coolray Windows Operating Systems and Software 3 01-06-2008 06:08 PM
Corrupt windows XP file, wont boot XP spikoman69 Windows Operating Systems and Software 4 07-07-2007 05:43 AM
Batch file steak1986 Windows Operating Systems and Software 6 04-11-2007 06:03 PM
Having trouble getting a downloaded file Bendersterrier Browser & General Internet Questions 1 03-28-2007 12:42 PM