Call Of Duty.United Offence

Forceflow · 10-23-2004, 10:03 PM

I just finished the expansion pack a few minutes ago, and i have mixed feelings. I am a huge fan of COD singleplayer (didn't get into the multiplayer). but i just loved the scenario and the atmostphere the game gave... i really felt i was apart of the war. The scenes we just too cool and the graphics ran smooth, and the sound was phenominal.

I don't or hardly see any of that in the expansion. They "tweaked" the engine... yet it somehow manages to runs choppy???(wtf) The sounds were ok, although the voices were not nearly as excited as in the first one... the men spoke in monotone and the dialog wouldn't be anyones words in real life. The scenes were pretty cool... they took alot of the stuff from the original (ideas and such)....

man...

i cant believe this happened

I don't know exactly whats going on, maybe my standards are higher than when i played the original. I heard ID software switched the teams producing the game... (i think its splash damage now) .

Did anyone else play it/finish it?

I havn't played online i heard that improved alot ( i dont have a valid cd key

)

GameGURU · 10-24-2004, 02:11 AM

Um...I played both and I have to say UO conquered the orginal.

I dont know what you had a problem with...better graphics, bigger battles, no stupid british missions (they were actually fun), better sounds.

Same game just superduperfied.

Forceflow · 10-24-2004, 09:13 AM

it isnt at all how i remembered it... my standards probably increase and i didnt notice.. ****

10-23-2004, 10:03 PM	#1 (permalink)
Forceflow True Techie Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 165	Call Of Duty.United Offence I just finished the expansion pack a few minutes ago, and i have mixed feelings. I am a huge fan of COD singleplayer (didn't get into the multiplayer). but i just loved the scenario and the atmostphere the game gave... i really felt i was apart of the war. The scenes we just too cool and the graphics ran smooth, and the sound was phenominal. I don't or hardly see any of that in the expansion. They "tweaked" the engine... yet it somehow manages to runs choppy???(wtf) The sounds were ok, although the voices were not nearly as excited as in the first one... the men spoke in monotone and the dialog wouldn't be anyones words in real life. The scenes were pretty cool... they took alot of the stuff from the original (ideas and such).... man... i cant believe this happened I don't know exactly whats going on, maybe my standards are higher than when i played the original. I heard ID software switched the teams producing the game... (i think its splash damage now) . Did anyone else play it/finish it? I havn't played online i heard that improved alot ( i dont have a valid cd key )

10-24-2004, 02:11 AM	#2 (permalink)
GameGURU Wizard Techie Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,546	Um...I played both and I have to say UO conquered the orginal. I dont know what you had a problem with...better graphics, bigger battles, no stupid british missions (they were actually fun), better sounds. Same game just superduperfied. __________________ 15'' Macbook Pro Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16ghz x1600 128MB 1GB DDR2 SDRAM Windows XP/Mac OSX 10.5 No longer a Guru of games...

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-24-2004, 09:13 AM	#3 (permalink)
Forceflow True Techie Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 165	it isnt at all how i remembered it... my standards probably increase and i didnt notice.. ****