[Brinson]

He may have, indeed, found the source code.

[wicked23]

For those critics and those that like to speculate, yes I indeed found the source code.

And when i open everyfile using qb the person who made it was nice enough to put notes in it detailing what everything looks at and how it works.

[Wolff]

Originally Posted by wicked23

For those critics and those that like to speculate, yes I indeed found the source code.

And when i open everyfile using qb the person who made it was nice enough to put notes in it detailing what everything looks at and how it works.

Critics? You asked for help and we warned you about the implications of what you were asking. Having the source code is a completely different animal all together and is - naturally - a lot easier to work out from. Now you have something to work out from. Not bad having had a programmer that actually documents his code either :freak:

[jaeusm]

An exe file is always binary

Usually, but not always.

[Brinson]

I can call my text file a .exe if I feel like it.

[jaeusm]

That's true, but I was referring to .NET executables.

[Wolff]

Originally Posted by jaeusm

That's true, but I was referring to .NET executables.

Valid point, reverse engineering byte code is a **** of a lot easier than reverse engineer a regular binary exe file as well.