Computers |
|
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Super Techie Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 274
| how do i find the maximum fsb for my particular motherboard. I saw thi s on overclock.net and i was curious what he meant by the following sentence. Quote:
Nick
__________________ Proud owner of the only hampster powered rig on these boards. | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| \m/ Metalhead \m/ Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 801
| You would change the CPU to RAM ratio only if you have RAM that doesn't overclock well. Lets say for instance that your CPU can take 300 MHz, but the RAM can only take something like 250 MHz. When you raise the FSB (HTT with an AMD) it will automatically raise it for the RAM as well, so you must set up a ratio if the RAM is maxing out and your CPU isn't. For instance, if you set up a 5:1 ratio, if you increase the FSB from 250 MHz to 255 MHz, the RAM is only going to get 1 MHz more instead of 5 more. The only way to find out the max FSB your motherboard can support is if your CPU can be overclocked (and is stable) further than the motherboard can go. Other than that, there is no way to find out the max FSB the motherboard can do.
__________________ CPU: Intel Q6600 B3 @ 3.0 GHz Cooler: Tuniq Tower 120 Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L RAM: G.Skill 4 GB DDR2 800 GPU: EVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512 MB HDD: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 160 GB PSU: OCZ StealthXStream 600W Case: Cooler Master Centurion 5 |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Monster Techie Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,759
| RAM is linked to the FSB, so raising the FSB also increases the speed of the RAM. All that is saying is to increase the RAM divider so you have headroom on raising the FSB before the RAM starts running at speeds higher than it is designed to. The other thing you would want to do to test your max FSB is lower the CPU multi as low as it can go and make sure to lower the LDT multi as well. One example, lets say you chip runs at 2Ghz and your running DDR400, default settings are: CPU multi x10 FSB 200 RAM 200 LDT x5 Now lets say you do the following: Lower CPU multi to x6 RAM divider to 2:1 (may look like 100Mhz in BIOS) Lower LDT to x3 Now you can raise the FSB to 333 without the CPU, RAM or LDT being overclocked, get it? The results would be: CPU = 6x333 = ~2Ghz RAM = 333/2 = 166 LDT = 3x333 = ~1000Mhz The main point is when trying to find one components max speed, you want to take other components out of the equation.
__________________ ![]() BE HEARD - Techonvent DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz 24/7 | 2GB OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| \m/ Metalhead \m/ Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 801
| Ah, yes, idiotec. I forgot about dropping the multiplier down. I guess that would be a good way to find max FSB.
__________________ CPU: Intel Q6600 B3 @ 3.0 GHz Cooler: Tuniq Tower 120 Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L RAM: G.Skill 4 GB DDR2 800 GPU: EVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512 MB HDD: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 160 GB PSU: OCZ StealthXStream 600W Case: Cooler Master Centurion 5 |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Ultra Techie Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: NY, USA
Posts: 662
| LDT = hypertransport...you want to try to keep this around 1000mhz...fsb (or HTT) x LDT = hypertransport Mhz
__________________
|
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |