Core Temp vs OCCT Temps.

[Peter.Cort]

So I finally got my new cooler and have started oc'ing my e2200, and have run into a bit of an issue. I'm sort of limited in my oc at the moment, because in using OCCT it says my load temps are around 58-60. but when I loaded up coretemp, it said my load temps were around 44-46. Now that 12-14 C difference could mean higher clocks, so which one should I put my faith into. Here's a SS of it.
(1440x900, don't wanna kill dialuppers.)

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/6...pvsocctxx3.jpg

[commandercup]

I think OCCT is showing you the actual CPU temperature while core temp is showing you the core temps

go by the core temps, and thus core temp

[dying4004]

commandercup: bro so u recommend using coretemp??

[commandercup]

yes

and I'm pretty sure everyone at tech-forums does as well

however... like I said, OCCT is probably reporting actual CPU temperatures, so thats also what your computer goes by so if you have an auto-shutoff temp setup in your bios, it'll turn off when the CPU temp reaches the temperature set.

[carnageX]

CoreTemp and OCCT give the same readings for me..

OCCT reads the cores' temps just like CoreTemp, commander .



They're just a little bit off from each other because they don't update temps at the same rate as each other.

[commandercup]

oh, I thought it was the main CPU temperature because his screeny only shows 1 temperature for the OCCT

[carnageX]

Try enabling the cores in the Settings > Monitoring tab. I have both of my cores enabled, so that could be why I'm getting the right temps read to me.

[gurusan]

Yeah they should be reading the same temps.

On a lighter note, I just got to 3.6ghz on 1.32v!

[vernong1992]

let me try this on my PC... brb

EDIT: crap-tacular, Core architecture only for Core Temp... wtf, but OCCT said its 68C idle, 79C load..

[gurusan]

occt must be defaulting to another sensor on your cpu. And wow that sounds high. My laptop 3.06ghz P4-M only ran about 68c full load......do you have dust or something in your case?