Computers |
|
| | #21 (permalink) | |
| \m/ Metalhead \m/ Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 799
| Quote:
I hope that AMD pulls through, I'd really like to see them on top of Intel once again.
__________________ CPU: Intel Q6600 B3 @ 3.0 GHz Cooler: Tuniq Tower 120 Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L RAM: G.Skill 4 GB DDR2 800 GPU: EVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512 MB HDD: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 160 GB PSU: OCZ StealthXStream 600W Case: Cooler Master Centurion 5 | |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| Super Techie Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 300
| Quote:
![]() Also, if Intel achieves 45nm, not only will they be lower in temperature (Core 2 Duos are extremely cool compared to other processors), but they would also be cheaper to make, which in turn passes the savings to us. I know AMD can pull through this, but they're a bit sluggish. | |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| \m/ Metalhead \m/ Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 799
| 45nm will mean less power consumption and less heat. I don't think that smaller usually means a better OC.
__________________ CPU: Intel Q6600 B3 @ 3.0 GHz Cooler: Tuniq Tower 120 Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L RAM: G.Skill 4 GB DDR2 800 GPU: EVGA 8800GT Superclocked 512 MB HDD: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 160 GB PSU: OCZ StealthXStream 600W Case: Cooler Master Centurion 5 |
| | |