Quote:
Originally posted by The General
Well, despite the typos and lies, I guess it was an okay review? It didn't have any benchmarks, but it did include a photo that made it look dirty.
I don't like it, to be honest.
"Best and latest processor" = Athlon 64 3500+ ??? |
There were no typos or lies. It is an OK review. And at least i completed the review in PDF...
Having a review without a photo is like having a recipe without the amounts that you need...its pointless.
For $380, what processor is better? 3.1 Ghz Celeron? Nothing is better for the price.
Quote:
well, it's a review, that's for sure.
And I guess anything is better then your previous celeron processor.
EH? Talldude?
|
Anything is better than that Celeron. The Celeron wasn't that bad, but the computer was incomplete, crappy quality, and just plain slow. I mean...Celeron M's are OK.