Quote:
Originally Posted by Akubane  50 frames per second vs 60. youd see them what, 1/10th of a second sooner-ish? I doubt your reaction time is accurate to within 1/10th of a second lol.
I guess it's just hardwired into peoples heads now, if anything just the idea of only having 50fps is making them perform poorly. placebo effect ftL.
i have full confidence in steams capability to make this a great game. One of the few companies I don't have any gripes with, minus being forced to launch everythign from the steam client. That's a bit irritating. Anyway, I'll wait for some reviews and videos, and a thourough bug review before payign for it, but if its CS:S with way better graphics I'm in.
Yeah gameplay is more important than graphics but I've been spoiled by this system and the newer games, I'd rather not look at anythign sub-par anymore.
If anything they should give it great looks with the option of scaling it down to the CS:S junk for all the people that'll whine about not getting 4000 fps. (not targeted at you, pointed at the people who actually do whine about not getting 150fps. lmao) |
Thats me... Honestly i notice the diffrence between below 100 fps and 200 fps. It doesnt usually go down to 100 fps on my rig but still... i notice it.
Or maybe i dont and its in my mind, but im not going to complain if they come out with the game and i get 60fps... infact i hope they do... that means i'll have an advantage over the people trying to play it on 7600 gt's.
BTW, i agree... i havent played cs:s for many days now and i finally have the high pitched voices of team mates and pubbers out of my head. thank geezus.