Thread: Q9300 vs. Q6600
View Single Post
Old 03-14-2008, 03:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Merkwürdigeliebe
Benevolent Cake Despot
 
Merkwürdigeliebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, CANADA
Posts: 1,598
Default Re: q9300 vs q6600

Quote:
Originally Posted by veedubfreak View Post
6mb. The q6xxx have 8, the low end q9xxx have 6, and the higher end have 12mb. And cache makes a huge difference until the new architecture does away with FSB.
I know, I was reffering to the Q9450 vs the Q6600...

Considering that the Q6600 is about $100 cheaper on average, the Q6600 still beats it out for value, some Q9450s are almost $400... the Q9300 is going for about $310... the price and low multi is just not doing it for these processors. I mean, in those reviews, the only benefit I see is if you're into encoding and the likes - but in gaming there's no improvement whatsoever, and as for the cache, I don't see it helping in games....
__________________


|Intel Q6600 | 2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers | XFX 8800GTS 512 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L | Antec 900 | Antec Neo 500 HE |
Merkwürdigeliebe is offline   Reply With Quote