Thread: Q9300 vs. Q6600
View Single Post
Old 03-14-2008, 02:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
Merkwürdigliebe
Benevolent Cake Despot
 
Merkwürdigliebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, CANADA
Posts: 1,585
Default Re: q9300 vs q6600

Quote:
Originally Posted by nOcLuE98 View Post
no, the q9400 is only .5 more. the q9450 is 8.5x

I dont know, the motherboard is holding the little thing back.

If the q9450 can drop to some decent prices, I think it will end up the OCers choice. Faster fsb, more cache.. because I am pretty sure the q9450 steps up the cache right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merkwürdigliebe View Post
Q9450 FSB = 1333MHz

QDR = 1333MHz/4 = 333.25MHz

333.25MHz x 8 (multiplier) = 2666MHz = 2.66GHz

If the Q9450 had an 8.5x multiplier, its default clock would be 2.83GHz, which it's not, the Q9550 has an 8.5x multiplier and it's got a default clock of 2.83GHz. Look for yourself:



VR-Zone : Technology Beats - Intel Desktop CPUs Price Cut Schedule


List of future Intel Core 2 microprocessors - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yeah more L2, I know... but whatever, I don't think there'll be a major difference over 8MB and 12MB to be quite honest
__________________


|Intel Q6600 | 2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers | XFX 8800GTS 512 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L | Antec 900 | Antec Neo 500 HE |
Merkwürdigliebe is offline   Reply With Quote