I am on the fence on net neutrality. Here is a crappy example: Let us say that some person has some important document, and has to send it to China or some other place far far away. Someone else has the latest video of some celebrity and they are trying to stream this everywhere. Well under net neutrality these two things would not take priority over the other. In corporate offices, the traffic is prioritized, and thusly important stuff goes first. Net neutrality thinks these things should all be prioritized equally. (Obviously this example does not due the argument justice, but it is the only one I can think of) Between point A and point B, there must be some added thinking to this public system. I'm open to any and all opinions that could sway me. Please do not tell me that the big bad Telecoms will block sites. That is why we have the FCC. (Even though most of you hate the FCC
) The original post by kfc469, where is that article from? Seemed a bit bias.