View Single Post
Old 04-17-2007, 12:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
kmote
 

Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: England

Posts: 2,192

kmote has a spectacular aura aboutkmote has a spectacular aura about

Default Re: Why Linux cannot replace Windows?

atomic tofu - what?
"Anything can replace Windows if it is designed to do so, from product but more importantly to marketing."
most linux distros are free, how are they to be marketed?

Windows monopolises the OS and particularly the home OS market because they make dramatic threats and business moves in order to prevent people from knowing and using alternatives. When 3.1 came out there was another OS called Geoworks. Geoworks was way better that 3.1 but it still disappeared because microsoft threatened to stop supplying DOS to manufacturers who put Geoworks on their machines. Microsoft then took legal action against Geoworks saying that they had stolen their 'style' when in fact geoworks was working in Apple and commodore before windows was released.
there are loads of other examples of things the Microsoft does to keep itself where it is that have nothing to do with being a better product but this is one that i was reading about recently
Windows Vista (Dinosaur Sightings: Windows splash screens from 1.01 to Vista)

basically in my opinion there is almost nothing in your post that is entirely correct but im not going to go through it all
__________________
MSI P43 Neo|Enermax Pro82+ 425W|E5200|silent 8500GT|250GB Samsung spinpoint F1|Samsung SATA DVD RW|4GB Corsair|Antec SOLO|openSUSE11


There are in order of increasing severity: lies, darn lies, statistics, and computer benchmarks. - diskinfo man page
kmote is offline