[Review for Acer T160]

[Review for Acer T160] - Computers

Search Tech-Forums - link takes you to our Forum's search page.

Note: The following is only a text archive!

To view the actual forum discussion, please visit our website at http://www.tech-forums.net

Pages:1

Review for Acer T160
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: talldude123

Thought this could go into the newsletter:

[url]http://members.shaw.ca/tall_dude123/acerreview.pdf[/url]

Posted by: The General

Well, despite the typos and lies, I [i]guess[/i] it was an okay review? It didn't have any benchmarks, but it did include a photo that made it look dirty.

I don't like it, to be honest.

"Best and latest processor" = Athlon 64 3500+ ???

Posted by: HAVOC

well, it's a review, that's for sure.

And I guess anything is better then your previous celeron processor.
EH? Talldude?

Posted by: talldude123

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by The General [/i]
[B]Well, despite the typos and lies, I [i]guess[/i] it was an okay review? It didn't have any benchmarks, but it did include a photo that made it look dirty.

I don't like it, to be honest.

"Best and latest processor" = Athlon 64 3500+ ??? [/B][/QUOTE]

There were no typos or lies. It is an OK review. And at least i completed the review in PDF...

Having a review without a photo is like having a recipe without the amounts that you need...its pointless.

For $380, what processor is better? 3.1 Ghz Celeron? Nothing is better for the price.

[quote]well, it's a review, that's for sure.

And I guess anything is better then your previous celeron processor.
EH? Talldude?
[/quote]

Anything is better than that Celeron. The Celeron wasn't that bad, but the computer was incomplete, crappy quality, and just plain slow. I mean...Celeron M's are OK.

Posted by: Mr. Switch

ummm.... sure.