Google and Microsoft sued for links to filesharing sites - Tech & Computer Forums

Go Back   Tech & Computer Forums > Member's Area > Off Topic Discussion > Polls
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-11-2009, 05:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Smile. You Met A Pagan.
 
Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,858
Default Google and Microsoft sued for links to filesharing sites

ZitZot Google and Microsoft sued for links to filesharing sites
Quote:
Google and Microsoft sued for links to filesharing sites

Mini music label Blue Destiny Records has sued both Google and Microsoft for allegedly “facilitating and enabling” the illegal distribution of copyrighted songs.

Filed on Monday with a US federal court in Northern Florida, the suit is an attempt to choke off the distribution of Blue Destiny tunes on the Germany-based file-sharing service RapidShare, also named as a defendant. It accuses RapidShare of knowingly running “a distribution center for unlawful copies of copyrighted works,” while claiming that Google and Microsoft are propping the company up.

According to the suit, RapidShare benefits from ad relationships with the two search giants. “RapidShare generates revenue by selling subscriptions for its high-speed download services, and through advertising dollars generated by its advertising partnerships with Google and Microsoft,” the suit reads. “RapidShare’s business success is accomplished only with the knowing assistance of these two top search engines – Google and Microsoft’s Bing.”

But the overarching claim is that RapidShare is able to “achieve consistent prominent ranking in search engine results that direct users to websites where illegal ‘free’ copies of [Blue Destiny's] recordings may be stolen.” US copyright law exempts companies from liability if they’re merely linking to infringing content – but only if they’re unaware of the infringement and don’t receive financial benefit.

The suits insists that Google and Microsoft benefit financially because they generate ad revenue from search results. And both companies have received DMCA takedown notices requesting removal of the links in question.

As Santa Clara University prof and tech law blogger Eric Goldman points out, this is hardly the first lawsuit to attack a company for merely linking to infringing content on other sites. But it’s unusual that the defendants have such recognizable names.

“There have been other lawsuits against websites for linking to infringing content, but plaintiffs usually try to avoid suing power players like Google and Microsoft – both well-funded defendants who aren’t likely to roll over on this issue,” Goldman writes.

There is at least one precedent, he says: a 2006 suit against Google and Amazon from “adult men’s magazine” and online ad outfit Perfect 10. That suit ended with a rather ambiguous court ruling, leaving the door open for the likes of Blue Destiny – though Goldman questions whether the label’s destiny is a major search engine scalp.

“Given the ambiguities of [the Perfect 10 opinion], [Blue Destiny's suit] isn’t clearly wrong as a doctrine matter. However, in my opinion, it is nevertheless ill-advised and unlikely to succeed,” he says.

That said, the suit may highlight some intriguing differences between Google and Microsoft in this gray area of online copyright law.

The suit’s wording is inconsistent, but in places it appears to accuse Google of directly linking to downloads of unauthorized tunes. “Google’s consistent and prominent ranking of links to illegal ‘free’ downloads of [Blue Destiny's] copyrighted recordings has devastated [Blue Destiny's] business,” the suit reads, before pointing to specific RapidShare links that have appeared when users search Google for the Roy Powers song “Firing Line.”

It would appear, however, that Google is not linking directly to such downloads. It links to RapidShare landing pages where the download urls are listed. In other words, Google’s top “Roy Powers Firing Line” result points to a RapidShare page that serves up several links where you can download the song.

According to Eric Goldman, the suit’s claims against Google lose some oomph when you consider that extra degree of link separation.

According to court documents, Blue Destiny – a blues label based in Destin, Florida – have attempted to remove the Google links in question via a DMCA takedown notice. But apparently, Google has not complied.

On the other hand, Microsoft has complied with such notices. This could point to a difference in DMCA philosophy. But it may also indicate that Bing’s design leaves Microsoft in a slightly tighter position than Google. Bing’s results page lets you open a preview window for each result that shows you a sizable chuck of its content before you visit. The site claims that this window displayed direct links to infringing downloads.

“MS Bing goes a step further than Google by allowing users an immediate preview [of] deep linked content on the underlying website without actually opening the website link,” the suit reads. “In the case of [Blue Destiny's] recordings , MS Bing provided an additional pop-up window that specifically identified each and every individual song title and the song order available at the link to the infringing website.”

But the links are no longer there, thanks to those DMCA takedown notices. Which makes you wonder why Blue Destiny is suing Redmond in the first place. “I’m not sure how Microsoft could be liable if they expeditiously removed the links after receiving the copyright owner’s notices,” Goldman says.

Is there a case against RapidShare? The company is based in Europe, and it does not appear to accept DMCA takedowns. “The complaint says they are a German/Swiss operation, so they may be impossible to serve and sue in the US, and RapidShare may not have felt any need to satisfy a US law formality.”

Microsoft declined to comment on the suit. And Google did not answer our request for comment. Par for the course, really.
__________________

"I FEEL SO GOOD I FEEL SO NUMB, YEAH!!!" -- Rob Zombie
Main Rig - AMD FX-8350x8 4.0Ghz CPU, 4x 8Gb (32Gb) DDR3 G.Skill Trident X Ram, Gigabyte GA-970A-D3, GeForce GTX 660Ti 2Gb, 1x 6Tb (3+2+1) SATA HDD, DVDRW, SB X-Fi, Win 7x64 Ultx64
Asus N61JV-JX231V - Intel Core i5 450m (2.4GHz), 8GB, 640GB, 16" Display, nVidia 325M 1Gb, DVD-RW, Win 7x64 Ult
HP Folio 9407m - Intel Core i5 3437U (1.9GHz), 8GB, 256GB SSD, 13" Display, Intel HD 4000 Graphics, Win 8x 64 Ent
Mobile Phone : Samsung Galaxy III G4 GT-I9305T Tablet : Asus Transformer 32Gb with Keyboard
Harper is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OffiSync Adds Google Docs To Microsoft Office Osiris Tips, Tricks & Tutorials 0 05-19-2009 09:05 AM
Can someone here analyze my Hijack log please? [F] soarwitheagles HijackThis Logs (finished) 17 07-04-2008 07:41 AM
2nd HijackThis Log File xXxexpertxXx HijackThis Logs (finished) 30 03-10-2008 05:24 AM
HELP: Infected System script.kiddie Viruses, Spyware and Malware 6 12-15-2007 12:54 PM
Online Rival to Microsoft Office Launches kmanmx Off Topic Discussion 1 11-25-2007 08:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO