[prolly a stupid question] -
prolly a stupid question
Discuss prolly a stupid question
Posted by: neversleeps
i have the 3 redhat 9 iso discs, i have the cd-rom set as the first boot device in bios but when i start with the first disc in the drive it just skips over it and boots into windows. do i have to make the cd bootable or something, what am i missing? all thats on each of them is the iso.
also ive read about some of u using redhat fedora open source
is this preferable over redhat 9.0?
and i dont want to to install lilo or grub so it will b alright if i just use a linux boot disk when i want boot into linux, rite?
and lastly am i rite on saying knoppix is just something i can burn and pop in it and use linux and get the feel of it before installing or partitioning anything?
thx for ur time and im sure ill have more ?'s if i get this installed and like it, im sure anything is better than microsucks shiat. :D
Posted by: neversleeps
yes now i feel like a dumbass, ive worked with some iso's but they were always for my HDD not trying to make a boot cd with um. how i didnt realize i needed to extract um first i wont kno
thanks Oberjaeger
and isobuster is bein a headache so i may have some more for ya
Posted by: neversleeps
i gave up on isobuster and got the free trial of nero so all is good on making the installation discs.
to u RH users, should i get rid of RH 9 and go to Fedora or is there a better distro i should b tryin first. i kno everyone has there own preferences and needs but my first distro i want to b one that isnt going to give me headaches doing alot of the console line commands n stuff til i learn it all, easy to install and compatable alongside of win xp, with a nice interface to it, any recommendations? or should i just stay with RH 9 :)
Posted by: chrönik04
neversleeps- the isos are put up to eliminate any confusion on the users part. you just dl the isos to your hd, insert a cdr and make a cd from the image. if you have already installed rh9 to the hd just stick w/it.. its fine. i still use it myself for my desktop machine, soon i will install redhat enterprise edition.
Posted by: lo_tek
Welcome to the wonderful word, neversleeps... I tend to agree that if you have RH9 running, stick with it for now. Once you get a feeling for the OS, you can do some research into distros you might like to try. From personal experience, after debian, rh, suse, slackware etc etc... i use slack on my machines. Do some research, read some books and the right distro will appear. But again, rh aint bad at all.
Posted by: whiteknight
I agree with lo_tek. You will have to decide on your own which distro you want to use. Redhat is a very good place to start because of its ease of use and good installer. Once you become more expierenced you can fool around with other distros.